.jpg)
Attorney not entitled to practice in Central District
Desiree:
It wont hurt to serve both. Otherwise you may get a kickback for failure
to serve. I have never heard a court refuse to do what was requested
because someone was served that didnt need to be.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Serve the motion upon the debtor and the attorney. Even if unable to practice, without a substitution, ineligible atty is still atty of record and you have to serve atty of record.
dennis.
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 3:22 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Attorney not entitled to practice in Central District
I am filing a motion for relief from stay and the attorney
on the 2010 Chap 13 is now not eligible to practice in CDCA. A quick look at calbar.org shows that the State Bar has converted his status to in 2011 for failure to respond to them on some transgression.
So who do I serve the motion on? I checked the FRCP and did
not see a rule on this (checking before I posted because we all know Dennis).
My gut says to serve him and the debtor and just move
forward. Any other ideas out there?
Desiree Causey, Esq.
Law Office of Desiree Causey
17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-375-6663
714-908-7646 (fax)
Any tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail (and any
attachments thereto) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law
provisions.
Privileged And Confidential Communication.
This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are
protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC 2510-2521),
(b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are
for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the
electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
If not an attorney the the represented party is now pro per. Serve the party the attorney represented.
Jonathan Leventhal, esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
On May 18, 2012, at 3:22 PM, "Desiree Causey" wrote:
> Huntington
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I am filing a motion for relief from stay and the attorney on the 2010 Chap
13 is now not eligible to practice in CDCA. A quick look at calbar.org
shows that the State Bar has converted his status to inactive in 2011 for
failure to respond to them on some transgression.
So who do I serve the motion on? I checked the FRCP and did not see a rule
on this (checking before I posted because we all know Dennis).
My gut says to serve him and the debtor and just move forward. Any other
ideas out there?
Desiree Causey, Esq.
Law Office of Desiree Causey
17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-375-6663
714-908-7646 (fax)
Any tax advice contained in the body of this e-mail (and any attachments
thereto) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the
recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
Privileged And Confidential Communication.
This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are
protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC
2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information, and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named
above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify
the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the contents of the information received in error is
strictly prohibited.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.