.jpg)
Motion to extend auto stay
One MFRS filed in the chapter 13 by separated wife to pursue alimony. My
plan is to file a motion to extend the stay past 30 days, with the
exception of the wife's alimony issue.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dennis wrote:
> **
>
>
> No, but so what? It is the debtors job to convince court, a poor motion
> will be denied. What are the facts?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>
>
> When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and
> debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion
> to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
One MFRS filed in the chapter 13 by separated wife to pursue alimony. My plan is to file a motion to extend the stay past 30 days, with the exception of the wife's alimony issue.On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dennis <easky1@yahoo.com> wrote:
No, but so what? It is the debtors job to convince court, a poor motion will be denied. What are the facts?Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 16, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
No, but so what? It is the debtors job to convince court, a poor motion will be denied. What are the facts?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
> When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
>
>
No, but so what? It is the debtors job to convince court, a poor motion will be denied. What are the facts?Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 16, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and
debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion
to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
When a ch 13 is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction (debt limits) and debtor files a new ch 11 to deal with the debt limits issue, and a motion to extend the stay is filed, anyone see a judge denying the extension?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.