.jpg)
fees related to an order to comply from the City
No clean up just a fine.
-----Origa]" Sent: Aug 14, 2014 3:52 PM To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] fees related to an order to comply from the City Did the city clean up the property and is therefore charging him for the work? If not, it is restitution or maybe part restitution, part fine.If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.PatPatrick T. GreenAttorney at LawFitzgerald & Green1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206Pasadena, CA 91106Tel: 626-449-8433Fax: 626-449-0565
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charset="UTF-8"
Did the city clean up the property and is therefore charging him for the work? If not, it is restitution or maybe part restitution, part fine.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
That is what I thought.
-----Orig]" Sent: Aug 14, 2014 1:55 PM To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] fees related to an order to comply from the City I think its a fine: not restitution. Same problem though. No good argument.Steven B. Lever Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:01 PMTo: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comSubject: [cdcbaa] fees related to an order to comply from the CityMy debtor received an order to comply in 2010 from the City of LA and ignored it. It was something to do with debris in the yard while the property was being remodeled. The bill is now $2,300. Is there any argument that can be made that is not a restitution claim and is possibly dischargeable?Stella
The post was migrated from Yahoo.