.jpg)
Why do banks file RFS in CH7?
charset="UTF-8"
Ah, I knew someone would know a good reason. So this is a way to block the serial filers from multiple filing just to forestall foreclosure. That makes sense.
Thanks Catherine.
Best regards
Larry Webb
blslogo
California Board of Legal Specialization
Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Check out my Blog
Larry@webbklaw. com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Guys:
This discussion was not appropriate for our list.
if you cannot say something nice about other lawyers who are in our group. Say nothing.
D
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 5:13 PM, 'Larry Webb' larry@webbklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Sorry I thought that was understood.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Larry Webb
>
>
>
>
>
> California Board of Legal Specialization
>
> Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
>
>
>
> State Bar of California 229344
>
> Central District California
>
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
>
> Check out my Blog
>
>
>
>
>
> Larry@webbklaw. com
>
> Law Offices of Larry Webb
>
> 484 Mobil Ste 43
>
> Camarillo Ca 93010
>
>
>
> P 805.987.1400
>
> F 805.987.2866
>
> C 805.750.2150
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:57 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Why do banks file RFS in CH7?
>
>
>
>
>
> I assume you're looking for a better answer than: For the attorneys to make money.
>
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> Mailing Address Only:
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
> On 10/2/2014 12:02 PM, 'Larry Webb' larry@webbklaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> US Bank aka Wells Fargo has filed a RFS motion in one of my no asset ch7 cases. The debtors are underwater on the 2nd and 3rd [all WF] and barely above water on the first [cost of sale plus note exceeds value] No notice of default has been filed. Debtors have a prepetition loan mod to pay arrears. Debtors cannot afford ch13 plan payments.
>
>
>
> The question, the RFS hearing was set for 56 days after the 341 hearing; discharge and the case will be closed before Wells Fargo gets the RFS order entered, so why file it?
>
>
>
> WF had asked for a reaffirmation agreement, debtors declined. Is the RFS retribution?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Larry Webb
>
>
>
>
>
> California Board of Legal Specialization
>
> Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
>
>
>
> State Bar of California 229344
>
> Central District California
>
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
>
> Check out my Blog
>
>
>
>
>
> Larry@webbklaw. com
>
> Law Offices of Larry Webb
>
> 484 Mobil Ste 43
>
> Camarillo Ca 93010
>
>
>
> P 805.987.1400
>
> F 805.987.2866
>
> C 805.750.2150
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Sorry I thought that was understood.
Best regards
Larry Webb
blslogo
California Board of Legal Specialization
Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Check out my Blog
Larry@webbklaw. com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
US Bank aka Wells Fargo has filed a RFS motion in one of my no asset ch7
cases. The debtors are underwater on the 2nd and 3rd [all WF] and barely
above water on the first [cost of sale plus note exceeds value] No notice
of default has been filed. Debtors have a prepetition loan mod to pay
arrears. Debtors cannot afford ch13 plan payments.
The question, the RFS hearing was set for 56 days after the 341 hearing;
discharge and the case will be closed before Wells Fargo gets the RFS order
entered, so why file it?
WF had asked for a reaffirmation agreement, debtors declined. Is the RFS
retribution?
Best regards
Larry Webb
blslogo
California Board of Legal Specialization
Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Check out my Blog
Larry@webbklaw. com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150
The post was migrated from Yahoo.