.jpg)
Can someone explain the rationale behind the "two party dispute"
I do not understand why having a two party dispute is considered a bad
faith factor for filing. What does it matter if the debtor has 100
creditors or one?
If a debtor is being sued in state court and he can't afford to litigate
it, what's wrong with just filing BK if that's his only creditor? Isn't
every bankruptcy that has prebankruptcy litigation filed "in order to
defeat state court litigation" in some way?
Please opine because I do not comprehend why the two party dispute issue is
a problem.
Holly Roark
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
*and Sports Lawyer*
holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
**For a quicker response, email me at holly@roarklawoffices.com.
I only use gmail for my listservs, and am likely to miss private emails
directed to my gmail account.**
I do not understand why having a two party dispute is considered a bad faith factor for filing. What does it matter if the debtor has 100 creditors or one?If a debtor is being sued in
The post was migrated from Yahoo.