Ch. 13 title and mortgage question

[Yahoo Bot]

Wes said it would be faster if he brought the documents in for me to scan
because otherwise, he has to drive 30 minutes to a friend's business to use
his fax machine. I expect him to be here in about 2 hours because I know
how long the drive is and he still needs to obtain certain bank statements.
Right now, my plan is to scan and email those documents to you, but also,
if it would be easier for him to come to your office, he can do that. I'm
not sure which is the better option in terms of distance and expediency.
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *
Avanesian Law Firm
801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite #1130
Glendale, CA 91203
Tel: 818.276.2477 | Fax: 818.208.4550
*Confidentiality**: *This electronic transmission and its contents are
legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply
to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
*IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:* To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon,
for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Shannon Doyle
sdoyle@ebankruptcyassistants.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> And it does not matter that debtor is not on the mortgage. If you get
> Judge Johnson, make sure to check his section of the courts website for
> his special forms and procedures. He requires you file a pre-petition 12
> month history of the mortgage payments. He may also dismiss your case if
> debtor is one day late on her post-petition mortgage payment.
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: New Professional Pic2]
>
> Shannon A. Doyle
>
> *Attorney | Virtual Bankruptcy Assistant*
>
> *Phone: 855-378-4080 *
>
> *Fax: 562-249-8435 *
>
> *Licensed in California*
>
> [image: PetitionPartnD05bR08aP01ZL-Madison8a]
>
>
> [image: http://pcmweb.net/devglobal/emaildev/eB ... img/fb.png]
> [image:
> http://pcmweb.net/devglobal/emaildev/eB ... witter.png]
> [image:
> http://pcmweb.net/devglobal/emaildev/eB ... google.png]
> [image:
> http://pcmweb.net/devglobal/emaildev/eB ... nkedin.png]
> [image:
> http://pcmweb.net/devglobal/emaildev/eB ... /email.png]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 21, 2016 3:29 PM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Ch. 13 title and mortgage question
>
>
>
>
>
> Andy,
>
>
>
> See Section 102(2).
>
>
>
> "Rental income" might be better received in Riverside than a "contribution
> from family" for plan feasibility purposes.
>
>
>
> Good luck
>
> Peter
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:01 AM, andyn013@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am new to the group and have found this message board extremely helpful
> already! Now I have a question of my own:
>
>
>
> I have a potential client who is a recent divorcee (let's call her Jane).
> Jane received their home in the divorce and she is the only person on title
> currently. However, she is not on the actual mortgage. Will this be in an
> issue in her 13? She is facing a sale date and would be doing the 13 to
> cure the arrearage on the home.
>
>
>
> Also, we will be using her live-in daughter's income as a contribution.
> The daughter is currently on EDD Disability? Will the Riverside Judges
> consider this as "regular income" that we can use as additional
> income/contribution?
>
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
>
>
> Andy Nguyen
>
> (909) 579-8223
>
> andy@anguyenlawgroup.com
>
>
>
Wes said it would be faster if he brought the documents in for me to scan because otherwise, he has to drive 30 minutes to a friend's business to use his fax machine. I expect him to be here in about 2 hours because I know how long the drive is and he still needs to obtain certain bank statements.Right now, my plan is to scan and email those documents to you, but also, if it would be easier for him to come to your office, he can do that. I'm not sure which is the better option in terms of distance and expediency.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

[Yahoo Bot]

Andy,
See Section 102(2).
"Rental income" might be better received in Riverside than a "contribution from family" for plan feasibility purposes.
Good luck
Peter
Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:01 AM, andyn013@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am new to the group and have found this message board extremely helpful already! Now I have a question of my own:
>
>
>
> I have a potential client who is a recent divorcee (let's call her Jane). Jane received their home in the divorce and she is the only person on title currently. However, she is not on the actual mortgage. Will this be in an issue in her 13? She is facing a sale date and would be doing the 13 to cure the arrearage on the home.
>
>
>
> Also, we will be using her live-in daughter's income as a contribution. The daughter is currently on EDD Disability? Will the Riverside Judges consider this as "regular income" that we can use as additional income/contribution?
>
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
>
>
> Andy Nguyen
>
> (909) 579-8223
>
> andy@anguyenlawgroup.com
>
>
See Section 102(2). "Rental income" might be better received in Riverside than a "contribution from family" for plan feasibility purposes.Good luck Peter Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:01 AM, andyn013@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hi All,I am new to the group and have found this message board extremely helpful already! Now I have a question of my own:I have a potential client who is a recent divorcee (let's call her Jane). Jane received their home in the divorce and she is the only person on title currently. However, she is not on the actual mortgage. Will this be in an issue in her 13? She is facing a sale date and would be doing the 13 to cure the arrearage on the home.Also, we will be using her live-in daughter's income as a contribution. The daughter is currently on EDD Disability? Will the Riverside Judges consider this as "regular income" that we can use as additional income/contribution? Thanks for the help!Andy Nguyen(909) 579-8223andy@anguyenlawgroup.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

[Yahoo Bot]

Reply-To: andyn013@yahoo.com
X-Original-Return-Path: andyn013@yahoo.com
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system

The post was migrated from Yahoo.