.jpg)
Filing fee to Superior Court for filing a Notice of
This is not first hand experience, but I've been hearing some grumbling from
other attorneys that fee waivers in the LASC have been harder to obtain,
especially when the party has enough money to pay an attorney to represent
him/her. It's worth a try, but I think it's better to bring the issue up
to the Clerk of the Court so that the problem can be nipped in the bud.
Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela Romero, APLC
1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115
Pasadena, CA 91104
Telephone:626-817-2611
Facsimile: 626-628-1781
email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein
is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this
message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by e-mail
and immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal
tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Arnold Hernandez wrote:
>
>
> Here is a suggestion for you, submit with the fee waiver form. If your
> client is in bankruptcy, clearly he should be entitled to a fee waiver. If
> you do try it, let us know what happens.
>
> Arnold Hernandez
>
> --- On *Fri, 4/30/10, Nikki * wrote:
>
>
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: Filing fee to Superior Court for filing a Notice of
> Stay of Civil proceedings?
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 2:41 PM
>
>
>
>
> It's actually the Van Nuys Court! I called them up and this one lady
> there insists that since it is the first document filed by my client in
> the Civil Case, he Must pay the fee. Otherwise, she will not notify the
> Judge about the BK and the NAS!
>
> She said she has this conversation with many other BK attorneys
> (apparently) and just because other clerks "make mistakes" of not
> charging a filing fee, doesnt mean she will do the same....
>
> I've resubmitted already a couple of times, but to no avail... not sure
> what to do.
>
> --- In cdcbaa@yahoogroups. com,
> "Mark J. Markus" wrote:
> >
> > That's nonsense. This must be downtown LA, right? Those people don't
> > know which end is up right now. Just resubmit it. There's no filing
> fee.
> >
> > ************ ********* ****
> > Mark J. Markus
> > Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> > 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> > Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> > (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> > web: http://www.bklaw. com/
> > This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this
> means at
> http://bklaw. com/bankruptcy- blog/2008/ 09/debt-relief- agencies-
> definition\
> /
> )
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________
> > NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
> office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
> intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
>
> addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the
> contents of this message is prohibited.
> > IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
> imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in
> this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to
>
> be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
> under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
> recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in
> this communication.
> >
> >
> > On 4/30/2010 2:08 PM, Nikki wrote:
> > > Client had a lawsuit pending in Superior Court. Ch 7 was filed and
> Notice of Stay of Proceedings sent to Superior Court to notify them of
> the BK filing.
> > > The Clerk is requiring my client to pay $300+ filing fee for this
> document to be filed and put on record!??
> > >
> > > This has never come up with any other Superior Court or Clerk
> before.... Any insight/recommended response?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Nikki Hashemi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
This is not first hand experience, but I've been hearing some grumbling from other attorneys that fee waivers in the LASC have been harder to obtain, especially when the party has enough money to pay an attorney to rep
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
That's nonsense. This must be downtown LA, right? Those people don't
know which end is up right now. Just resubmit it. There's no filing fee.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at http://bklaw.com/bankruptcy-blog/2008/0 ... efinition/)
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
On 4/30/2010 2:08 PM, Nikki wrote:
> Client had a lawsuit pending in Superior Court. Ch 7 was filed and Notice of Stay of Proceedings sent to Superior Court to notify them of the BK filing.
> The Clerk is requiring my client to pay $300+ filing fee for this document to be filed and put on record!??
>
> This has never come up with any other Superior Court or Clerk before.... Any insight/recommended response?
>
> Thanks.
> Nikki Hashemi
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.