.jpg)
debtor on title for estate planning purposes.
Judge Zurzolo
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, January 12, 2010 12:27:49 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] debtor on title for estate planning purposes.
which judge?
>Subject: [cdcbaa] debtor on title for estate planning purposes.
>To: "consumer bk group"
>Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 8:59 AM
>
>
>
>I had a hearing yesterday inChapter 13 in LA where the court ruled that the debtor had titlefor all purposes even though the parents had put debtor on title when debtor was still a minor, for estate plannning purposes and debtor had never made any payments or claimed any mortgage deductions.
>Patricia Said.
>Attorney at Law
>13443 McCormick Street
>Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
>(818)789-0781.
>
>
__.._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group Messages in this topic (4)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group Start a New Topic
MARKETPLACE
Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green living
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest Unsubscribe Terms of Use
.
Judge Zurzolo
From: Dennis McGoldrick <easky1@yahoo.com>To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comSent: Tue, January 12, 2010 12:27:49 PMSubject: Re: [cdcbaa] debtor on title for estate planning purposes.
which judge?--- On Tue, 1/12/10, patricia said <patriciahsaid@ yahoo.com> wrote:
cia said <patriciahsaid@ yahoo.com>Subject: [cdcbaa] debtor on title for estate planning purposes.To: "consumer bk group" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups. com>Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 8:59 AM
I had a hearing yesterday in Chapter 13 in LA where the court ruled that the debtor had title for all purposes even though the parents had put debtor on title when debtor was still a minor, for estate plannning purposes and debtor had never made any payments or claimed any mortgage deductions.
Patricia Said.
Attorney at Law
13443 McCormick Street
Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
(818)789-0781.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
If you put somebody's name on title to real property its not required that
they make payments or live there. Trying to claim they don't really have an
interest under these circumstances (name put on years ago, etc.) would be an
uphill struggle, and you see it in divorce cases a lot. An interest would
be easier to set aside if your client had used fraud, undue influence, etc.
but in this case the parents added him.
Margaret Norman, Attorney
111 N. Sepulveda Blvd. #355
Manhattan Beach, Ca. 90266
310-376-7873
Fax-310-798-9846
WWW:Margeslaw.com
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:36:59 -0800
"Hale Andrew Antico" wrote:
> Would that be distinguished from the bank account for a minor where
>notice
> was given in the title itself... the bank account in the name of the
>adult
> "as guardian for" minor?
>
>
> _____
>
>Behalf Of
> patricia said
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 8:59 AM
> To: consumer bk group
> Subject: [cdcbaa] debtor on title for estate planning purposes.
>
>
>
>
> I had a hearing yesterday in Chapter 13 in LA where the court
>ruled that
> the debtor had title for all purposes even though the parents had
>put debtor
> on title when debtor was still a minor, for estate plannning
>purposes and
> debtor had never made any payments or claimed any mortgage
>deductions.
> Patricia Said.
> Attorney at Law
> 13443 McCormick Street
> Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
> (818)789-0781.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Circular 230: To assure complaince with Treasury Dept regs., be informed
that any advice contained in this communication and/or attachments was not
written and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax
penalties that may be imposed on taxpayer. The advice and/or suggestions may
not be used in connection with promoting, marketing, or recommending to any
person any transaction or matter mentioned herein. All opinions are for
purposes of discussion on this forum only.
This mail was scanned by BitDefender
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I had a hearing yesterday inChapter 13 in LA where the court ruled that the debtor had titlefor all purposes even though the parents had put debtor on title when debtor was still a minor, for estate plannning purposes and debtor had never made any payments or claimed any mortgage deductions.
Patricia Said.
Attorney at Law
13443 McCormick Street
Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
(818)789-0781.
I had a hearing yesterday in Chapter 13 in LA where the court ruled that the debtor had title for all purposes even though the parents had put debtor on title when debtor was still a minor, for estate plannning purposes and debtor had never made any payments or claimed any mortgage deductions.
Patricia Said.
Attorney at Law
13443 McCormick Street
Sherman Oaks, CA 91401
(818)789-0781.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.