.jpg)
trustee objection to exemption
Fellow listserve members,
Kindly provide referrals to competent Bankruptcy Counsel who practice in Montana.
Thanks,
Peter
Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
Thank you.
From michael@avanesianlaw.com Wed Feb 24 18:57:21 2016
Return-Path:
X-Sender: michael@avanesianlaw.com
X-Apparently-To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 30882 invoked by uid 102); 25 Feb 2016 02:57:21 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.33)
by m7.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2016 02:57:21 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 6449 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2016 02:57:20 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mta1003.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.170.167)
by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2016 02:57:20 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path:
X-Received-SPF: softfail (transitioning domain of avanesianlaw.com does not designate 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender)
I would call it an opposition.
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *
Avanesian Law Firm
801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite #1130
Glendale, CA 91203
Tel: 818.276.2477 | Fax: 818.208.4550
*Confidentiality**: *This electronic transmission and its contents are
legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply
to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
*IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:* To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon,
for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Kirk Brennan kirkinhermosa@gmail.com
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> What is the proper title of a response to a trustee objection to exemption?
> reply to trustee objection?
> opposition to trustee objection?
> Something else?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
I would call it an opposition.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
What is the proper title of a response to a trustee objection to exemption?
reply to trustee objection?
opposition to trustee objection?
Something else?
Thanks
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
What is the proper title of a response to a trustee objection to exemption?reply to trustee objection?opposition to trustee objection?Something else?Thanks-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.