.jpg)
Fwd: Proper Venue for exemptions - FINAL DECISION FROM 9TH CIRCUIT
Thanks. But I didn't work on the BAP and 9th Circuit alone. Jan Lawson help tremendously as well.
Nate
"Law Offices of Louis J. Esbin" wrote: Congratulations, Nate. Hope you attend the June 19th BAP Dinner. You
will most certainly should be recognized for your efforts!! Lou Esbin
--- In cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com, P L wrote:
>
> Great job Nate!
>
> Nathan Berneman wrote: Many of you may
recall my homestead exemption case in Santa Barbara. If not, I have
attached a copy of my original question to the group back in 2006 or so.
>
> Just to let you know the scene of events:
>
> 1. Trustee filed Objection to Homestead Exemption and LOST;
> 2. Trustee appealed the decision to the BAP and in 2006 and LOST;
> 3. Around 9/2006, Trustee appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit
who just heard the case on 5/7/08 and made a final decision (ATTACHED)
on 5/14/08 - TRUSTEE LOST AGAIN.
> A. The court found that TEMPORARY ABSENCE FROM A
RESIDENCE STILL COUNTS FOR A PERSON TO CLAIM AN AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD
EXEMPTION.
>
> I am thrilled to now be done with this case as the Trustee finally
got the point and filed a No-Asset Report last week. My client should
now, after 3 years, receive her discharge.
>
> Nate Berneman
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:13:02 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Proper Venue for exemptions
> To: cdcbaa
>
> I filed a Chapter 7 in August 2005 in Santa Barbara. Debtor
lives in Santa Cruz , California where she owns a house but she has
been visiting her niece in Moorpark since April or May, 2005 due to
depression, etc.
>
> I took the homestead exemption for $150,000 due to debtor being over
55 years of age and earning less than $15,000 in the 12 months prior
plus she has owned the house for more that 4 years along with her partner.
>
> I just received a message from the client that the Trustee has filed
an Objection to the homestead exemption. (Stipulation was filed that
allowed Objections to be filed until 1/30/06). I have not seen it
yet, but I assume it is based on venue purposes.
>
> I have reviewed cases where debtor filed in one State, resided in
another State and took the other State's exemptions.
>
> Does anyone have any case law where one filed in a different
district, etc. in the same State? Has anyone had a similar situation?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nate Berneman
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Photos
> Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your
hands ASAP.
>
Thanks. But I didn't work on the BAP and 9th Circuit alone. Jan Lawson help tremendously as well.Nate"Law Offices of Louis J. Esbin" <Esbinlaw@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Congratulations, Nate. Hope you attend the June 19th BAP Dinner. You will most certainly should be recognized for your efforts!! Lou Esbin --- In cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com, P L <petermlively2000@...> wrote: > > Great job Nate! > > Nathan Berneman
<nathanberneman@...> wrote: Many of you may recall my homestead exemption case in Santa Barbara. If not, I have attached a copy of my original question to the group back in 2006 or so. > > Just to let you know the scene of events: > > 1. Trustee filed Objection to Homestead Exemption and LOST; > 2. Trustee appealed the decision to the BAP and in 2006 and LOST; > 3. Around 9/2006, Trustee appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit who just heard the case on 5/7/08 and made a final decision (ATTACHED) on 5/14/08 - TRUSTEE LOST AGAIN. > A. The court found that TEMPORARY ABSENCE FROM A RESIDENCE STILL COUNTS FOR A PERSON TO CLAIM AN AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION. > > I am thrilled to now be done with this case as the Trustee finally got the point and filed a No-Asset Report last week. My client should now, after 3 years, receive her
filed an Objection to the homestead exemption. (Stipulation was filed that allowed Objections to be filed until 1/30/06). I have not seen it yet, but I assume it is based on venue purposes. > > I have reviewed cases where debtor filed in one State, resided in another State and took the other State's exemptions. > > Does anyone have any case law where one filed in a different district, etc. in the same State? Has anyone had a similar situation? > > Thanks, > > Nate Berneman > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Photos > Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. >
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charset="US-ASCII"
Well Done!!!
M. Erik Clark
Borowitz, Lozano & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.blclaw.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
American Board of Certification
________________________________
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Congratulations, Nate. Hope you attend the June 19th BAP Dinner. You
will most certainly should be recognized for your efforts!! Lou Esbin
>
> Great job Nate!
>
> Nathan Berneman wrote: Many of you may
recall my homestead exemption case in Santa Barbara. If not, I have
attached a copy of my original question to the group back in 2006 or so.
>
> Just to let you know the scene of events:
>
> 1. Trustee filed Objection to Homestead Exemption and LOST;
> 2. Trustee appealed the decision to the BAP and in 2006 and LOST;
> 3. Around 9/2006, Trustee appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit
who just heard the case on 5/7/08 and made a final decision (ATTACHED)
on 5/14/08 - TRUSTEE LOST AGAIN.
> A. The court found that TEMPORARY ABSENCE FROM A
RESIDENCE STILL COUNTS FOR A PERSON TO CLAIM AN AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD
EXEMPTION.
>
> I am thrilled to now be done with this case as the Trustee finally
got the point and filed a No-Asset Report last week. My client should
now, after 3 years, receive her discharge.
>
> Nate Berneman
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:13:02 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Proper Venue for exemptions
> To: cdcbaa
>
> I filed a Chapter 7 in August 2005 in Santa Barbara. Debtor
lives in Santa Cruz , California where she owns a house but she has
been visiting her niece in Moorpark since April or May, 2005 due to
depression, etc.
>
> I took the homestead exemption for $150,000 due to debtor being over
55 years of age and earning less than $15,000 in the 12 months prior
plus she has owned the house for more that 4 years along with her partner.
>
> I just received a message from the client that the Trustee has filed
an Objection to the homestead exemption. (Stipulation was filed that
allowed Objections to be filed until 1/30/06). I have not seen it
yet, but I assume it is based on venue purposes.
>
> I have reviewed cases where debtor filed in one State, resided in
another State and took the other State's exemptions.
>
> Does anyone have any case law where one filed in a different
district, etc. in the same State? Has anyone had a similar situation?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nate Berneman
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Photos
> Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your
hands ASAP.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Kudos, Nate!
______________________
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
Toll Free: 1-866-576-6275
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
___________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communicat
----- Original Message -----
To: cdcbaa
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 9:43 AM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Fwd: Proper Venue for exemptions - FINAL DECISION FROM 9TH CIRCUIT
Many of you may recall my homestead exemption case in Santa Barbara. If not, I have attached a copy of my original question to the group back in 2006 or so.
Just to let you know the scene of events:
1. Trustee filed Objection to Homestead Exemption and LOST;
2. Trustee appealed the decision to the BAP and in 2006 and LOST;
3. Around 9/2006, Trustee appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit who just heard the case on 5/7/08 and made a final decision (ATTACHED) on 5/14/08 - TRUSTEE LOST AGAIN.
A. The court found that TEMPORARY ABSENCE FROM A RESIDENCE STILL COUNTS FOR A PERSON TO CLAIM AN AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION.
I am thrilled to now be done with this case as the Trustee finally got the point and filed a No-Asset Report last week. My client should now, after 3 years, receive her discharge.
Nate Berneman
Note: forwarded message attached.
#ygrp-mkp {
The post was migrated from Yahoo.