Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Exempt funds belong to the debtor, not the estate. First, Debtor has to
exempt the pre-petition funds garnished. Then, you argue the the government
has a lien to be avoided. The twist with the IRS vs. a typical judgment
creditor is I'm not sure if IRS uses a writ of execution to garnish funds.
You may need to do some more research, but an execution lien is a lien
created by levy under a writ of execution. A levy on property under a writ
of execution creates an execution lien on the property from the time of the
levy. See Cal. Code of Civil Proc. Section 697.710 and Grover v. Bay View
Bank, 87 Cal.App.4th 452, 459 (2001). The order on the motion can compel
the IRS to return the exempt funds back to the employer and the employer to
return the funds to the debtor.
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:22 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Interesting. I'll have to look into that. But avoiding the lien doesn't
necessitate turnover of the pre-petition funds garnished, does it? In fact,
the existence of the lien post-filing is virtually irrelevant unless there
is real property. The real issue of my hypo was to recover wages garnished.
I think the theory would be under a preference theory.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Interesting. I'll have to look into that. But avoiding the lien doesn't necessitate turnover of the pre-petition funds garnished, does it? In fact, the existence of the lien post-filing is virtually irrelevant unless there is real property. The real issue of my hypo was to recover wages garnished. I think the theory would be under a preference theory.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
----- Original Message -----
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
I would argue that it does work per the following: you can avoid judicial liens per Section 522(f)(1)(A), and a judicial lien is a lien obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable process or proceeding (See Code Section 101(36)). Attachment, execution and garnishment liens are judicial liens for the purposes of Section 522(f)(1)(A). In re Rodriguez, 278 BR 749, In re Weatherspoon, 101BR 533; and In re Yetter 112 B.R. 301.
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 12:44 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
This is the IRS, not a judgment lien, so I don't think 522(f) works...
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
----- Original Message -----
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Do a motion to avoid lien pursuant to 11 USC Section 522(f)(1)(A). -Mike Chekian
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:48 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Is there any basis for a debtor to recover wages garnished shorly before filing a Ch. 7 case? I've heard others successful in Turnover motions and others on a preference theory. IRS just took a huge chunk out of a client's paycheck and just thinking of what can be done.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cdcbaa/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdcbaa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
TT {
FONT-FAMILY: "Courier New"
}
SPAN.emailstyle18 {
COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
SPAN.EmailStyle20 {
COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}

Interesting. I'll have to look intothat. But avoiding the lien doesn't necessitate turnover of the
pre-petition funds garnished, does it? In fact, the existence of the lien
post-filing is virtually irrelevant unless there is real property. The
real issue of my hypo was to recover wages garnished. I think the theory
would be under a preference theory.

***********************************************Mark J. MarkusLaw
Office of Mark J. Markus11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA91604-2652(818)509-1173(818)509-1460 (fax)e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.comweb:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I would argue that it does work per the following: you can avoid
judicial liens per Section 522(f)(1)(A), and a judicial lien is a lien
obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable
process or proceeding (See Code Section 101(36)). Attachment, execution and
garnishment liens are judicial liens for the purposes of Section
522(f)(1)(A). In re Rodriguez, 278 BR 749, In re Weatherspoon, 101BR 533;
and In re Yetter 112 B.R. 301.
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 12:44 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
This is the IRS, not a judgment lien, so I don't think 522(f) works...
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


This is the IRS, not a judgment lien, so I don't think 522(f) works...
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
----- Original Message -----
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Do a motion to avoid lien pursuant to 11 USC Section 522(f)(1)(A). -Mike Chekian
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:48 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Is there any basis for a debtor to recover wages garnished shorly before filing a Ch. 7 case? I've heard others successful in Turnover motions and others on a preference theory. IRS just took a huge chunk out of a client's paycheck and just thinking of what can be done.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cdcbaa/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdcbaa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoAutoSig {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
TT {
FONT-FAMILY: "Courier New"
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
OL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}
UL {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0in
}

This is the IRS, not a judgment lien, so I don't
think 522(f) works...

***********************************************Mark J. MarkusLaw
Office of Mark J. Markus11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA91604-2652(818)509-1173(818)509-1460 (fax)e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.comweb:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Do a motion to avoid lien pursuant to 11 USC Section 522(f)(1)(A).
-Mike Chekian
Chekian Law Office
Michael Chekian, Esq.
11400 W. Olympic Blvd. #200
Los Angeles, CA 90064
(310) 390-5529 (Tel.)
(310) 445-8879 (Fax)
mike@cheklaw.com (e-mail)
cheklaw.com (web site)
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:48 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Recovering garnished wages in Ch. 7
Is there any basis for a debtor to recover wages garnished shorly before
filing a Ch. 7 case? I've heard others successful in Turnover motions and
others on a preference theory. IRS just took a huge chunk out of a client's
paycheck and just thinking of what can be done.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
_____
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cdcbaa/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdcbaa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Is there any basis for a debtor to recover wages garnished shorly before filing a Ch. 7 case? I've heard others successful in Turnover motions and others on a preference theory. IRS just took a huge chunk out of a client's paycheck and just thinking of what can be done.
***********************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173
(818)509-1460 (fax)
e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.com
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
************************************************
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone
other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at (818)
509-1173 or e-mail us at bklawr@bklaw.com and destroy the
original message and all copies.
Is there any basis for a debtor to recover wages
garnished shorly before filing a Ch. 7 case? I've heard otherssuccessful in Turnover motions and others on a preference theory. IRS
just took a huge chunk out of a client's paycheck and just thinking of what can
be done.

***********************************************Mark J. MarkusLaw
Office of Mark J. Markus11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA91604-2652(818)509-1173(818)509-1460 (fax)e-mail: bklawr@bklaw.comweb:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply