.jpg)
...and malicious
Another non-dischargability question to follow up my toll roads
question from last week (thanks for the tip, Mr. McGoldrick):
In a civil judgment where the jury verdict specifically says that
there was "malice" in the debtor's actions, does that make the
quarter-million dollar judgment against non-dischargable via 523? The
wilfull and malicious language of (a)(6)does seem to speak more
towards bodily injury which is not applicable in the fact pattern of
the underlying civil case. (no physical injury at all was alleged)
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide on a rainy Sunday
afternoon.
Hale Andrew Antico
The post was migrated from Yahoo.