.jpg)
Deceased Husband's Asbestos Lawsuit
Asbestos litigation can drag on for years.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Jamie wrote:
> **
>
>
> Listmates-
>
> PC's husband passed away, but his asbestos litigation is still continuing
> with no particular end date in sight. What would be the best way to protect
> the case (is the case protected only to the amount necessary for her
> livelihood, since she doesn't work?) or would it be best to advise PC not
> to file the case at all because of the possibly high interest of the
> trustee (asbestos cases usually result in high verdicts / settlements)
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Asbestos litigation can drag on for years.On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Jamie <michaelshemtoub@yahoo.com> wrote:
Listmates-
PC's husband passed away, but his asbestos litigation is still continuing with no particular end date in sight. What would be the best way to protect the case (is the case protected only to the amount necessary for her livelihood, since she doesn't work?) or would it be best to advise PC not to file the case at all because of the possibly high interest of the trustee (asbestos cases usually result in high verdicts / settlements)
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Listmates-
PC's husband passed away, but his asbestos litigation is still continuing with no particular end date in sight. What would be the best way to protect the case (is the case protected only to the amount necessary for her livelihood, since she doesn't work?) or would it be best to advise PC not to file the case at all because of the possibly high interest of the trustee (asbestos cases usually result in high verdicts / settlements)
The post was migrated from Yahoo.