.jpg)
Ch 13 Motion for Authority To Sell Real Property Service Question
I wouldn't, except that if you have a credit card issued through an FDIC bank, e.g., a Visa through BANK OF AMERICA, then what?
More importantly, given what this motion is for, authority to sell real property, no hearing required, any reason to send notice to every single creditor? Or is it sufficient to name the Chap 13 Trustee, the US Trustee, the Judge, the mortgage companies who have encumbrances against the house, and the attorneys who represent the mortgage companies?
Todd
>
> Why would you send certified mail to credit card companies? Most aren't
> "insured depository institutions."
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, t_mannis wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > all interested parties?"
> >
> > OK, Chap 13 Trustee, U.S. Trustee, Judge, mortgage companies and their
> > attorneys, absolutely.
> >
> > But what about other creditors, such as credit card companies?
> >
> > Relatedly, I wouldn't think this is a contested matter, so I would assume
> > that the requirements of 7004(h) (certified to officers of the company)
> > would not apply. I bring that up because I usually serve the mortgage
> > companies certified regardless; however, if I have to serve even the credit
> > card companies in this, I can't imagine having to then also hunt down the
> > CEO for each of them and send certified - not for this type of motion
> > anyways. Thoughts?
> >
> > Todd Mannis, Esq.
> > Calabasas, California
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Why would you send certified mail to credit card companies? Most aren't
"insured depository institutions."
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, t_mannis wrote:
> **
>
>
> all interested parties?"
>
> OK, Chap 13 Trustee, U.S. Trustee, Judge, mortgage companies and their
> attorneys, absolutely.
>
> But what about other creditors, such as credit card companies?
>
> Relatedly, I wouldn't think this is a contested matter, so I would assume
> that the requirements of 7004(h) (certified to officers of the company)
> would not apply. I bring that up because I usually serve the mortgage
> companies certified regardless; however, if I have to serve even the credit
> card companies in this, I can't imagine having to then also hunt down the
> CEO for each of them and send certified - not for this type of motion
> anyways. Thoughts?
>
> Todd Mannis, Esq.
> Calabasas, California
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Why would you send certified mail to credit card companies? Most aren't "insured depository institutions."On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, t_mannis <toddlaw@dslextreme.com> wrote:
all interested parties?"
OK, Chap 13 Trustee, U.S. Trustee, Judge, mortgage companies and their attorneys, absolutely.
But what about other creditors, such as credit card companies?
Relatedly, I wouldn't think this is a contested matter, so I would assume that the requirements of 7004(h) (certified to officers of the company) would not apply. I bring that up because I usually serve the mortgage companies certified regardless; however, if I have to serve even the credit card companies in this, I can't imagine having to then also hunt down the CEO for each of them and send certified - not for this type of motion anyways. Thoughts?
Todd Mannis, Esq.
Calabasas, California
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.