.jpg)
taxes of corp due by owner?
Yes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Easky2 wrote:
> **
>
>
> Kirk:
>
> Subject line and question do not match. Are you asking if the franchise
> fee of the corp is the personal liability of a shareholder?
>
> Sent from my NOOK
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
YesOn Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Easky2 <cdcbaamailbox@gmail.com> wrote:
Kirk:
Subject line and question do not match. Are you asking if the franchise fee of the corp is the personal liability of a shareholder?
Sent from my NOOK
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charsetndows-1252
It would be ironic if the FTB disregarded the corporate entity for this purpose.
They don't.
Jason
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Steven B. Lever wrote:
>
> No. Ive never seen it and Ive seen plenty of these situations.
>
>
>
> Steven B. Lever
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:16 PM
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Subject: [cdcbaa] taxes of corp due by owner?
>
>
>
>
>
> Is an individual debtor in a chapter 13 liable for FTB annual taxes ($800 minimum per year) of the individual's solely owned corporation?
>
> Gracias,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
>
charsetndows-1252
It would be ironic if the FTB disregarded the corporate entity for this purpose.They don't.Jason
Jason Wallach
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Is an individual debtor in a chapter 13 liable for FTB annual taxes ($800
minimum per year) of the individual's solely owned corporation?
Gracias,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Is an individual debtor in a chapter 13 liable for FTB annual taxes ($800 minimum per year) of the individual's solely owned corporation?Gracias,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.