.jpg)
Limiting Service in a chapter 11
I had a case called Parts.com in SFV around 2004-2005. Judge Tighe let me post the disclosure statement and plan etc on an internet site and just give notice to everyone by mail that they could look it up or they could op to get the package by mail. I heard Judge Thompson approve that once as well. Good luck. Jon
>
> John:
>
> I was in a case were reference to the internet was approved for voluminous
> disclosure documents. I am sorry it was sometime back and I don't recall
> the case. I was not representing the plan proponent.
>
> If I recall, the court required the notice to say if someone did not have
> access to the internet, the could call and request a copy be mailed.
>
>
> d
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:30 PM, John D. Faucher
> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Hello fellow practitioners: I have a chapter 11 case in which I am filing
> > a disclosure statement accompanied by at least two dozen exhibits, some
> > more than 70 pages long, to more than 100 interested parties. It is in
> > front of Judge Riblet, who tends to set disclosure statement hearings two
> > to four months ahead of time.
> > I intend to include (and abide by) the following paragraph in the
> > Disclosure Statement:
> >
> > Because of the number and size of the exhibits, and the expense of
> > printing and mailing them, counsel is filing a motion concurrent with this
> > Disclosure Statement seeking approval for allowing the exhibits to be
> > available on request and on the internet, but not mailing the exhibits with
> > the service copies. The exhibits are available at
> > www.johndfaucher.com/Disclosure_Statement _Exhibits, to any party on NEF,
> > or on request to counsel above. If the Court does not approve this method
> > of service, counsel will serve the exhibits by mail in time for interested
> > parties to consider them before the Disclosure Statement Hearing.
> > Does anyone have any experience with this issue, or advice whether this is
> > a good idea or not?
> >
> > John D. Faucher
> > Faucher & Associates
> > *818/889-8080*
> >
> >
> >
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
John:
I was in a case were reference to the internet was approved for voluminous
disclosure documents. I am sorry it was sometime back and I don't recall
the case. I was not representing the plan proponent.
If I recall, the court required the notice to say if someone did not have
access to the internet, the could call and request a copy be mailed.
d
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:30 PM, John D. Faucher
wrote:
> **
>
>
> Hello fellow practitioners: I have a chapter 11 case in which I am filing
> a disclosure statement accompanied by at least two dozen exhibits, some
> more than 70 pages long, to more than 100 interested parties. It is in
> front of Judge Riblet, who tends to set disclosure statement hearings two
> to four months ahead of time.
> I intend to include (and abide by) the following paragraph in the
> Disclosure Statement:
>
> Because of the number and size of the exhibits, and the expense of
> printing and mailing them, counsel is filing a motion concurrent with this
> Disclosure Statement seeking approval for allowing the exhibits to be
> available on request and on the internet, but not mailing the exhibits with
> the service copies. The exhibits are available at
> www.johndfaucher.com/Disclosure_Statement _Exhibits, to any party on NEF,
> or on request to counsel above. If the Court does not approve this method
> of service, counsel will serve the exhibits by mail in time for interested
> parties to consider them before the Disclosure Statement Hearing.
> Does anyone have any experience with this issue, or advice whether this is
> a good idea or not?
>
> John D. Faucher
> Faucher & Associates
> *818/889-8080*
>
>
>
John:I was in a case were reference to the internet was approved for voluminous disclosure documents. I am sorry it was sometime back and I don't recall the case. I was not representing the plan proponent.
If I recall, the court required the notice to say if someone did not have access to the internet, the could call and request a copy be mailed.d
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
LOL.
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
*Board Certified - Business Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
*Board Certified - Consumer Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
LOL.-- Giovanni Orantes, Esq.Certified Bankruptcy Specialist* Orantes Law Firm, P.C.3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010Tel: (213) 389-4362Fax: (877) 789-5776e-mail: go@gobklaw.comwebsite: www.gobklaw.com
*Board Certified - Business Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification*Board Certified - Consumer Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Giovanni - are you suggesting I actually read the rule and follow it?
Thanks for the tip. I think this will make it a lot easier.
John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates
*818/889-8080*
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Giovanni Orantes wrote:
> **
>
>
> Judge Riblet told me that my client's 200+ creditors was not a number
> worthy of a limit-notice order in a ch. 11. Why not just follow frbp
> 3017? She hasn't had a problem when I've done it.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
Giovanni - are you suggesting I actually read the rule and follow it?
Thanks for the tip. I think this will make it a lot easier.
John D. FaucherFaucher & Associates
818/889-8080
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Giovanni Orantes <go@gobklaw.com> wrote:
Judge Riblet told me that my client's 200+ creditors was not a number worthy of a limit-notice order in a ch. 11. Why not ju
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charset-ascii
Judge Riblet told me that my client's 200+ creditors was not a number worthy of a limit-notice order in a ch. 11. Why not just follow frbp 3017? She hasn't had a problem when I've done it.
Sent from my iPad
Judge Riblet told me that my client's 200+ creditors was not a number worthy of a limit-notice order in a ch. 11. Why not just follow frbp 3017? She hasn't had a problem when I've done it.Sent from my iPad
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Another idea, alternatively, is to serve the exhibits on a CD, and state
that if anyone wants them on paper, they can request it from you.
Nicholas S. Nassif, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF NICHOLAS S. NASSIF
3055 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: 213-736-1899 Fax: 213- 736-5656
nsnassif@pacbell.net
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Hello fellow practitioners: I have a chapter 11 case in which I am filing
a disclosure statement accompanied by at least two dozen exhibits, some
more than 70 pages long, to more than 100 interested parties. It is in
front of Judge Riblet, who tends to set disclosure statement hearings two
to four months ahead of time.
I intend to include (and abide by) the following paragraph in the
Disclosure Statement:
Because of the number and size of the exhibits, and the expense of printing
and mailing them, counsel is filing a motion concurrent with this
Disclosure Statement seeking approval for allowing the exhibits to be
available on request and on the internet, but not mailing the exhibits with
the service copies. The exhibits are available at
www.johndfaucher.com/Disclosure_Statement _Exhibits, to any party on NEF,
or on request to counsel above. If the Court does not approve this method
of service, counsel will serve the exhibits by mail in time for interested
parties to consider them before the Disclosure Statement Hearing.
Does anyone have any experience with this issue, or advice whether this is
a good idea or not?
John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates
*818/889-8080*
Hello fellow practitioners: I have a chapter 11 case in which I am filing a disclosure statement accompanied by at least two dozen exhibits, some more than 70 pages long, to more than 100 interested parties. It is in front of Judge Riblet, who tends to set disclosure statement hearings two to four months ahead of time.
I intend to include (and abide by) the following paragraph in the Disclosure Statement:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.