.jpg)
Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
Kirk,
Congratulations! First, get a transcript of the hearing or trial and work
from what the judge had to say from the bench.
Keep it simple. You know the facts and the law already. Also, you can
work with opposing counsel to sort this out before lodging with the court.
My experience is from the Schaffer student loan case. Attached is what was
lodged with the court after working with opposing counsel.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>
> Post-trial. Court has requested proposed findings of fact and conclusions
> of law.
> I haven't prepared one before.
> Anyone willing to share a sample or a case number (preferably in a 727
> action)?
>
> Gracias,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
5011 Argosy Avenue, Suite 3
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Office: 714-533-9210
Fax: 714-489-8150
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
Kirk,Congratulations! First, get a transcript of the hearing or trial and work from what the judge had to say from the bench.Keep it simple. You know the facts and the law already. Also, you can work with opposing counsel to sort this out before lodging with the court.
My experience is from the Schaffer student loan case. Attached is what was lodged with the court after working with opposing counsel.On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
Post-trial. Court has requested proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.I haven't prepared one before. Anyone willing to share a sample or a case number (preferably in a 727 action)?
Gracias,--
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post-trial. Court has requested proposed findings of fact and conclusions
of law.
I haven't prepared one before.
Anyone willing to share a sample or a case number (preferably in a 727
action)?
Gracias,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Post-trial. Court has requested proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.I haven't prepared one before. Anyone willing to share a sample or a case number (preferably in a 727 action)?
Gracias,--
The post was migrated from Yahoo.