.jpg)
Doctrine of Latches
Then of course there was the song - Latches, I'm depending on you son.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v3nzjNbra4
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
John:
You've become unhinged!
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Hello Pat: If you're trying to use the doctrine to shut the door on the
trustee's misguided attempts to do something, then it would seem that
"latches" would be the proper spelling.
Okay, that's a bad one.
John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates
*818/889-8080*
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Patrick T. Green wrote:
> **
>
>
> Please note that the proper spelling is laches.****
>
> ** **
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.****
>
> ** **
>
> Pat****
>
> ** **
>
> Patrick T. Green****
>
> Attorney at Law****
>
> Fitzgerald & Green****
>
> 1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206****
>
> Pasadena, CA 91106****
>
> Tel: 626-449-8433****
>
> Fax: 626-449-0565****
>
> pat@fitzgreenlaw.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 3:57 PM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Thanks!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq..****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> 818-347-5800****
>
> ** **
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not represent you until a
> written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been
> paid.****
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 3:40 PM, "Catherine Christiansen" christiansenlaw@yahoo.com> wrote:****
>
> ****
>
> Then file your opposition, it doesn't have to be much because you are
> filing a MoMod also. I am not sure if the 120 is necessary to pay all the
> claims so I would be careful about pointing the finger to harshly as the
> attorney is also supposed to be reviewing the claims to make sure the plan
> will pay out. Be sure and file the MoMod so the court will see the
> solution and you can get a yes answer. Don't forget to factor in your
> attorney fees so you can be paid for your work so your clients can enjoy
> the privilege of the protection of a chapter 13 bankruptcy. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
> 17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
> Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572
> attorneychristiansen@gmail.com****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* "Leventhal Law Group, P.C."
> *To:* "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 1:33 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Its Rojas, they will not talk they want an opposition filed!****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> Tel.: 818-347-5800****
>
> Fax: 818-936-0302****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written
> fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal
> Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 1:26 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> You may want to try talking with the trustee staff attorney assigned to
> the case about spreading out the missed payments over the remainder of the
> plan. Dockery's staff attorneys are usually very helpful.
> Also consider a motion to modify (MOMOD).****
>
> On Apr 15, 2013 1:07 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:*
> ***
>
> ****
>
> I would like the groups opinion on a matter.****
>
> ****
>
> I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Clients case by the Chapter 13
> Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost
> two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first
> filing a motion to dismiss.****
>
> ****
>
> The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this
> defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> Tel.: 818-347-5800****
>
> Fax: 818-936-0302****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written
> fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal
> Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
>
>
Hello Pat: If you're trying to use the doctrine to shut the door on the trustee's misguided attempts to do something, then it would seem that "latches" would be the proper spelling.
Okay, that's a bad one. John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates818/889-8080
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Patrick T. Green <pat@fitzgreenlaw.com> wrote:
Please note that the proper spelling is laches.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
PatPatrick T. Green
Attorney at LawFitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.comThe only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?
ground:white">
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Please note that the proper spelling is laches.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Then file your opposition, it doesn't have to be much because you are filing a MoMod also. I am not sure if the 120 is necessary to pay all the claims so I would be careful about pointing the finger to harshly as the attorney is also supposed to be reviewing the claims to make sure the plan will pay out. Be sure and file the MoMod so the court will see the solution and you can get a yes answer. Don't forget to factor in your attorney fees so you can be paid for your work so your clients can enjoy the privilege of the protection of a chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572
attorneychristiansen@gmail.com
________________________________
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches
Its Rojas, they will not talk they want an opposition filed!
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
From:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches
You may want to try talking with the trustee staff attorney assigned to the case about spreading out the missed payments over the remainder of the plan. Dockery's staff attorneys are usually very helpful.
Also consider a motion to modify (MOMOD).
On Apr 15, 2013 1:07 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
I would like the groups opinion on a matter.
I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Clients case by the Chapter 13 Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first filing a motion to dismiss.
The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Its Rojas, they will not talk they want an opposition filed!
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
You may want to try talking with the trustee staff attorney assigned to the
case about spreading out the missed payments over the remainder of the
plan. Dockery's staff attorneys are usually very helpful.
Also consider a motion to modify (MOMOD).
On Apr 15, 2013 1:07 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
> **
>
>
> I would like the groups opinion on a matter.****
>
> ** **
>
> I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Clients case by the Chapter 13
> Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost
> two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first
> filing a motion to dismiss.****
>
> ** **
>
> The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this
> defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> Tel.: 818-347-5800****
>
> Fax: 818-936-0302****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ** **
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ** **
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ** **
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written
> fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal
> Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.****
>
> ** **
>
>
You may want to try talking with the trustee staff attorney assigned to the case about spreading out the missed payments over the remainder of the plan. Dockery's staff attorneys are usually very helpful.
Also consider a motion to modify (MOMOD).
On Apr 15, 2013 1:07 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." <law@3yl.com> wrote:
I would like the groups opinion on a matter.I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Clients case by the Chapter 13 Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first filing a motion to dismiss.
The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I would like the groups opinion on a matter.
I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Client's case by the Chapter 13 Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first filing a motion to dismiss.
The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.