multiple related motions in single filing

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


some think it is better form to file two motions. Many lawyers would combine the two.
d
Sent from mars
On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:30 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
> I would still do it seperately.
>
>
> Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
> 818.347.5800
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Sent: 06/02/2013 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
>
>
>
> To clarify what I have in mind:
> Motion for OSC for creditor's disregard of court's order confirming plan; motion for sanctions
> 2 motions combined in one document
>
> Make sense?
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
>>
>>
>> No
>>
>> Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
>> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
>> 818.347.5800
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
>> Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
>> Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
>>
>>
>>
>> Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I would still do it seperately.
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: 06/02/2013 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
To clarify what I have in mind:
Motion for OSC for creditor's disregard of court's order confirming plan; motion for sanctions
2 motions combined in one document
Make sense?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
No
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
>
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
I would still do it seperately.
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 06/02/2013 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing

To clarify what I have in mind:
Motion for OSC for creditor's disregard of court's order confirming plan; motion for sanctions
2 motions combined in one document
Make sense?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
<law@3yl.com> wrote:

No
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
"_blank">kirkinhermosa@gmail.com>
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing

Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received
this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed
by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received
this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed
by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


To clarify what I have in mind:
Motion for OSC for creditor's disregard of court's order confirming plan;
motion for sanctions
2 motions combined in one document
Make sense?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
> **
>
>
> **
>
> No
>
> Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.818.347.5800
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
>
>
>
>
>
> Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
To clarify what I have in mind:Mo
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


No
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
No
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
818.347.5800
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing

Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received
this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed
by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?Thanks,-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply