Chapter 13 Proof of Claim Mortgage Arrears Inquiry

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


The reason for not allowing them to just have it is because the mortgage loan sits in a default status during the bk and they will periodically review, inspect, or otherwise perform additional services that are not necessary that are added to the debtor's mortgage.
These POCs are just the tip of the iceberg.
Christine
Sent from my iPad
Christine Wilton
12650 Hoover Street
Garden Grove, CA 92841
Tel: 877-631-2220
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Michael Avanesian wrote:
> Two things that I wonder about.
> 1. If Pite Duncan fights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
> 2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let them have it?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael Avanesian
> Attorney and Counselor at Law
> 818-817-1725
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
>>
>> I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're approved by the court.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Daniela P. Romero
>>
>> Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC
>> 1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212
>> Pasadena, CA 91104
>> Tel: (626) 817-2611
>> Fax: (626) 296-6991
>> email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
>> web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email and immediately delete this message.
>> My profiles:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton wrote:
>>>
>>> Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.
>>>
>>> Payments are current at the time of filing the case.
>>>
>>> I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in PostPetition Atty Fees.
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> Thanks Pite Duncan!!!
>>>
>>> Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling opposing counsel now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
>>> Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
>>>
>>> Our New Office Location:
>>> 12650 Hoover Street
>>> Garden Grove, CA 92841
>>>
>>> Mailing:
>>> 4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
>>> Lakewood, CA 90712
>>>
>>> Office: 877-631-2220
>>> Cell: 562-824-7563
>>> Fax: 1-636-212-7078
>>> Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
>>> Web: www.attorneychristine.com
>>> Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
>>> ***************************
>>> Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>>
>>> Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
>>
>
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Either because of 502(b) or 506(b) depending on where they are in the food
chain.
Sincerely,
Michael Avanesian
Attorney and Counselor at Law
818-817-1725
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM, PHiLiP E. KOeBeL, Esq.
wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> why are these fees not violations of the automatic stay?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Michael Avanesian michael@avanesianlaw.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Two things that I wonder about.
>> 1. If Pite Duncan fights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to
>> pay for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
>> 2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just
>> let them have it?
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Michael Avanesian
>> Attorney and Counselor at Law
>> 818-817-1725
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're
>>> approved by the court.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> *
>>>
>>> Daniela P. Romero*
>>> *Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC*
>>> *1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212*
>>> *Pasadena, CA 91104*
>>> *Tel: (626) 817-2611*
>>> *Fax: (626) 296-6991*
>>> *email: dromerolaw@gmail.com *
>>> *web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com*
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
>>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is
>>> confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
>>> This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
>>> addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
>>> you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
>>> disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
>>> email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
>>> integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
>>> communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of
>>> this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
>>> recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
>>> received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email
>>> and immediately delete this message.
>>> My profiles: [image: Blogger] [image: Facebook] [image:
>>> Twitter] [image: LinkedIn]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton >> attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.
>>>>
>>>> Payments are current at the time of filing the case.
>>>>
>>>> I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in
>>>> PostPetition Atty Fees.
>>>>
>>>> Really?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Pite Duncan!!!
>>>>
>>>> Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm
>>>> calling opposing counsel now.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
>>>> Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
>>>>
>>>> *Our New Office Location:
>>>> 12650 Hoover Street
>>>> Garden Grove, CA 92841*
>>>>
>>>> *Mailing:*
>>>> 4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
>>>> Lakewood, CA 90712
>>>>
>>>> Office: 877-631-2220
>>>> Cell: 562-824-7563
>>>> Fax: 1-636-212-7078
>>>> Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
>>>> Web: www.attorneychristine.com
>>>> Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
>>>> ***************************
>>>> Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including
>>>> attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and
>>>> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
>>>> review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone
>>>> other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any
>>>> ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may
>>>> apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>>> contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>>> Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice
>>>> contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to
>>>> and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax
>>>> penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has
>>>> been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Either because of 502(b) or 506(b) depending on where they are in the food chain.Sincerely, Michael AvanesianAttorney and Counselor at Law
818-817-1725
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM, PHiLiP E. KOeBeL, Esq. <lawofpek@gmail.com> wrote:
why are these fees not violations of the automatic stay?On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Michael Avanesian <michael@avanesianlaw.com> wrote:
Two things that I wonder about. 1. IfPite Duncanfights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let them have it?
Sincerely, Michael AvanesianAttorney and Counselor at Law818-817-1725
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero <dromerolaw@gmail.com> wrote:
I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're approved by the court.
Sincerely,Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212Pasadena, CA 91104Tel: (626) 817-2611
Fax: (626) 296-6991email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com
______________________________________________________________NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email and immediately delete this message.
My profiles:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton <attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.Payments are current at the time of filing the case.I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in PostPetition Atty Fees.
Really?Thanks Pite Duncan!!!Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling opposing counsel now.-- Christine A. Wilton, Esq.Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
Our New Office Location:12650 Hoover StreetGarden Grove, CA 92841Mailing:4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335Lakewood, CA 90712Office:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


why are these fees not violations of the automatic stay?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Michael Avanesian wrote:
> **
>
>
> Two things that I wonder about.
> 1. If Pite Duncan fights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay
> for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
> 2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let
> them have it?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael Avanesian
> Attorney and Counselor at Law
> 818-817-1725
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're
>> approved by the court.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> *
>>
>> Daniela P. Romero*
>> *Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC*
>> *1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212*
>> *Pasadena, CA 91104*
>> *Tel: (626) 817-2611*
>> *Fax: (626) 296-6991*
>> *email: dromerolaw@gmail.com *
>> *web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com*
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is
>> confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
>> This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
>> addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
>> you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
>> disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
>> email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
>> integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
>> communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of
>> this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
>> recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
>> received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email
>> and immediately delete this message.
>> My profiles: [image: Blogger] [image: Facebook] [image:
>> Twitter] [image: LinkedIn]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton > attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.
>>>
>>> Payments are current at the time of filing the case.
>>>
>>> I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in
>>> PostPetition Atty Fees.
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> Thanks Pite Duncan!!!
>>>
>>> Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling
>>> opposing counsel now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
>>> Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
>>>
>>> *Our New Office Location:
>>> 12650 Hoover Street
>>> Garden Grove, CA 92841*
>>>
>>> *Mailing:*
>>> 4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
>>> Lakewood, CA 90712
>>>
>>> Office: 877-631-2220
>>> Cell: 562-824-7563
>>> Fax: 1-636-212-7078
>>> Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
>>> Web: www.attorneychristine.com
>>> Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
>>> ***************************
>>> Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including
>>> attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and
>>> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
>>> review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone
>>> other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any
>>> ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may
>>> apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>> contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice
>>> contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to
>>> and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax
>>> penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has
>>> been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
why are these fees not violations of the automatic stay?On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Michael Avanesian <michael@avanesianlaw.com> wrote:
Two things that I wonder about. 1. IfPite Duncanfights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let them have it?
Sincerely, Michael AvanesianAttorney and Counselor at Law
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Two things that I wonder about.
1. If Pite Duncan fights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay
for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel?
2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let
them have it?
Sincerely,
Michael Avanesian
Attorney and Counselor at Law
818-817-1725
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
> **
>
>
> I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're
> approved by the court.
>
> Sincerely,
> *
>
> Daniela P. Romero*
> *Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC*
> *1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212*
> *Pasadena, CA 91104*
> *Tel: (626) 817-2611*
> *Fax: (626) 296-6991*
> *email: dromerolaw@gmail.com *
> *web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com*
> ______________________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is
> confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
> addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
> disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
> email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
> integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
> communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of
> this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
> recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
> received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email
> and immediately delete this message.
> My profiles: [image: Blogger] [image: Facebook] [image:
> Twitter] [image: LinkedIn]
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.
>>
>> Payments are current at the time of filing the case.
>>
>> I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in
>> PostPetition Atty Fees.
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> Thanks Pite Duncan!!!
>>
>> Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling
>> opposing counsel now.
>>
>> --
>> Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
>> Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
>>
>> *Our New Office Location:
>> 12650 Hoover Street
>> Garden Grove, CA 92841*
>>
>> *Mailing:*
>> 4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
>> Lakewood, CA 90712
>>
>> Office: 877-631-2220
>> Cell: 562-824-7563
>> Fax: 1-636-212-7078
>> Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
>> Web: www.attorneychristine.com
>> Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
>> ***************************
>> Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including
>> attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and
>> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
>> review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone
>> other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any
>> ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may
>> apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>> contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
>> message.
>>
>> Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice
>> contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to
>> and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax
>> penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has
>> been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
>>
>>
>
>
Two things that I wonder about. 1. IfPite Duncanfights you for the fees, doesn't your client have to pay for the fight? Both for your fees and opposing counsel? 2. If there is room to borrow from the unsecured payouts, why not just let them have it?
Sincerely, Michael AvanesianAttorney and Counselor at Law818-817-1725
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniela Romero <dromerolaw@gmail.com> wrote:
I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're approved by the court.
Sincerely,Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212Pasadena, CA 91104Tel: (626) 817-2611
Fax: (626) 296-6991email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com
______________________________________________________________NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email and immediately delete this message.
My profiles:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Christine Wilton <attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.Payments are current at the time of filing the case.I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in PostPetition Atty Fees.
Really?Thanks Pite Duncan!!!Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling opposing counsel now.-- Christine A. Wilton, Esq.Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
Our New Office Location:12650 Hoover StreetGarden Grove, CA 92841Mailing:4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335Lakewood, CA 90712Office:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I've called them to demand they remove those expenses until they're
approved by the court.
Sincerely,
*
Daniela P. Romero*
*Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC*
*1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 212*
*Pasadena, CA 91104*
*Tel: (626) 817-2611*
*Fax: (626) 296-6991*
*email: dromerolaw@gmail.com *
*web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com*

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Yes. I got a proof of claim for $425.00 for monitoring of the bankruptcy.
Stella

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.
Payments are current at the time of filing the case.
I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in
PostPetition Atty Fees.
Really?
Thanks Pite Duncan!!!
Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling
opposing counsel now.
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
*Our New Office Location:
12650 Hoover Street
Garden Grove, CA 92841*
*Mailing:*
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
Debtor's mortgage payments include impounds for taxes and insurance.Payments are current at the time of filing the case.I get a proof of claim for $88.12 in "escrow shortgage" and $425.00 in PostPetition Atty Fees.
Really?Thanks Pite Duncan!!!Question: Are you all seeing this level of ridiculousness? I'm calling opposing counsel now.-- Christine A. Wilton, Esq.Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
Our New Office Location:12650 Hoover StreetGarden Grove, CA 92841Mailing:4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335Lakewood, CA 90712Office: 877-631-2220Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078Email: attorneychristine@gmail.comWeb:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply