522(f) in a dismissed case

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm



The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Thanks Mark, I hope everyone realizes what a huge asset you are to this list serve.
>
> Jon:
>
> You are not wrong. See Section 349(b). However, the judgment creditor> will need to affirmatively take steps to clean up title if they paid
> attention to the case later being dismissed after the judgment lien was stripped.
>
> Mark T. Jessee
> Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
> 50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
> Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
> (805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
>
>
> In a message dated 7/12/2013 6:47:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> jhayes@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> Client files chapter 7 - 522(f) motion is granted - order stripping the > judgment lien is recorded. Later for irrelevant reasons, the chapter 7 is> dismissed - no discharge. I assume the 522(f) order is ineffective. I'm hoping
> I'm wrong. Anyone deal with this? Jon Hayes
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Jon:
You are not wrong. See Section 349(b). However, the judgment creditor
will need to affirmatively take steps to clean up title if they paid
attention to the case later being dismissed after the judgment lien was stripped.
Mark T. Jessee
Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
"A Debt Relief Agency"
50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
(805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
In a message dated 7/12/2013 6:47:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jhayes@hayesbklaw.com writes:
Client files chapter 7 - 522(f) motion is granted - order stripping the judgment lien is recorded. Later for irrelevant reasons, the chapter 7 is dismissed - no discharge. I assume the 522(f) order is ineffective. I'm hoping
I'm wrong. Anyone deal with this? Jon Hayes
Jon:

You are not wrong. See Section 349(b). However, the judgment
creditor will need to affirmatively take steps to clean up title if they
paid attention to the case later being dismissed after the judgment lien
was stripped.

Mark T.
JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief Agency"50 W.Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805) 497-5868 (805)
497-5864 (Facsimile)

In a message dated 7/12/2013 6:47:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jhayes@hayesbklaw.com writes:


Client files chapter 7 - 522(f) motion is granted - order stripping the
judgment lien is recorded. Later for irrelevant reasons, the chapter 7 is dismissed - no discharge. I assume the 522(f) order is ineffective. I'm hoping
I'm wrong. Anyone deal with this? Jon Hayes

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Client files chapter 7 - 522(f) motion is granted - order stripping the judgment lien is recorded. Later for irrelevant reasons, the chapter 7 is dismissed - no discharge. I assume the 522(f) order is ineffective. I'm hoping I'm wrong. Anyone deal with this? Jon Hayes

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply