Hardship Discharge Procedure

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I agree with Mark. The Order setting bar date is unnecessary.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Yahoo petermlively2000@yahoo.com [cdcbaa]
wrote:
>
>
> Correct you're gone and trustee's final accounting will be filed eventually
>
> Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
>
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 10:05 AM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I've never done one (and thus haven't read the rules recently) but didn't
> your 1328(b) Motion go out on notice to all creditors? If so, I don't see
> why they would get a second bite at the apple to object to discharge.
> Their opportunity to object was to the Motion. Of course, I could be
> entirely wrong about that.
>
> On 11/12/2015 9:53 AM, sam@southbaybk.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> I had a Motion for Hardship Discharge under 1328(b) granted. I then duly
> uploaded an Order Setting Bar Date for Nondischargeability complaints. The
> Judge signed that order and the BNC mailed it out. The "problem" is that
> the clerk also (immediately after the Motion was granted) issued the
> discharge and BNC mailed it out too. I don't want to rock the boat - but
> doesn't this seem peculiar? I did not even file the Debtors' Certificate of
> Compliance, and trustee has not yet filed an Intent to File Final Report.
> I'm inclined to just let it go, but I'm bothered because it seems that the
> discharge was issued prematurely. Anyone else have this experience?
>
>
>
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> *Mailing Address Only:*
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of
> Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office
> of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
> disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
> prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
I agree with Mark. The Order setting bar date is unnecessary.On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Yahoo petermlively2000@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Correct you're gone and trustee's final accounting will be filed eventually
Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 10:05 AM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> I've never done one (and thus haven't read the rules recently) but didn't your 1328(b) Motion go out on notice to all creditors? If so, I don't see why they would get a second bite at the apple to object to discharge. Their opportunity to object was to the Motion. Of course, I could be entirely wrong about that.
>
>> On 11/12/2015 9:53 AM, sam@southbaybk.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>> I had a Motion for Hardship Discharge under 1328(b) granted. I then duly uploaded an Order Setting Bar Date for Nondischargeability complaints. The Judge signed that order and the BNC mailed it out. The "problem" is that the clerk also (immediately after the Motion was granted) issued the discharge and BNC mailed it out too. I don't want to rock the boat - but doesn't this seem peculiar? I did not even file the Debtors' Certificate of Compliance, and trustee has not yet filed an Intent to File Final Report. I'm inclined to just let it go, but I'm bothered because it seems that the discharge was issued prematurely. Anyone else have this experience?
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> Mailing Address Only:
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply