.jpg)
LBR 9075-1 Order Shortening Time
Joe:
That is a nice touch, but if you want a hearing in 48 hours, the first service may not be in the creditors hands before the hearing. It would be nice if the court started acting like this is the 21st Century and let all service be electronic. Unfortunately, not all of our clients keep up email lists for their clients.
It won't be too many years before we serve everything electronically, for free.
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:35 PM, "Joseph E. Caceres" wrote:
>
> I always ask in the motion for OST that I not have to serve the underlying docs already served, and put a clause to that effect, and have never had a problem with that. Of course, notice of the hearing has to be sent out, whether by fax, overnite, calls, regular mail, whatever. It just seems to me to make no sense whatsoever to have to serve the underlying motion or app for OST twice.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:22 PM, "cdcbaa" wrote:
>>
>>
>> Gio is right. Just mail the app to everyone. When/if the court grants the OST, the court will order another service, maybe phone calls, etc., etc., etc......
>>
>> d
>>
>> Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Orantes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your reading is right. You have to serve twice as you interpret it.
>
>
On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:35 PM, "Joseph E. Caceres" <JEC@locs.com> wrote:
I always ask in the motion for OST that I not have to serve the underlying docs already served, and put a clause to that effect, and have never had a problem with that. Of course, notice of the hearing has to be sent out, whether by fax, overnite, calls, regular mail, whatever. It just seems to me to make no sense whatsoever to have to serve the underlying motion or app for OST twice.Sent from my iPhoneOn Oct 18, 2013, at 5:22 PM, "cdcbaa" <
Gio is right. Just mail the app to everyone. When/if the court grants the OST, the court will order another service, maybe phone calls, etc., etc., etc......dDennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voiceOn Oct 18, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Orantes <go@gobklaw.com> wrote:
Your reading is right. You have to serve twice as you interpret it.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Gio is right. Just mail the app to everyone. When/if the court grants the OST, the court will order another service, maybe phone calls, etc., etc., etc......
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Orantes wrote:
>
>
> Your reading is right. You have to serve twice as you interpret it.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
It's been awhile since I've done an application for an order shortening
time, and the LBR is below. I used to not give any notice, but I'm
looking at this LBR and confused. It appears that I have to give notice
twice, once before and once after the Court grants or denies the Order
Shortening Time.
However, the LBR says "unless otherwise ordered by the court" and the
court wouldn't possibly know anything about this application. Who would
want to run afoul of not serving properly and having the application
denied?
Am I reading this wrong? Do I only serve if the judge grants the
Application for an OST? I have to know soon. Thank you.
(4) Service of Application. Unless otherwise ordered by the court,
movant must serve
the application and the motion on each of the parties to whom notice of
the
underlying motion is required to be given under the FRBP and these
rules, the
United States trustee, and any other party that is likely to be
adversely affected by
the granting of the underlying motion. A separate notice of the
application is not
required.
Law Offices of Steven B. Lever
>
> Steven B. Lever
>( Tel. (562) 436-5456 ext. 1
>( Fax (562) 485-6886
>* sblever@leverlaw.com
> www.leverlaw.com
> ******************************************************
> This Internet e-mail contains confidential information
> which is intended only for the addressee and which may
> be privileged under applicable law. Do not read, copy
> or disseminate it if you are not the addressee. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and delete it. Thank you.
> ******************************************************
The post was migrated from Yahoo.