.jpg)
proposed order on mediator
atty's enough
d
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 1:23 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] proposed order on mediator
Does Form 702:
[PROPOSED] ORDER ASSIGNING MATTER TO MEDIATION PROGRAM AND APPOINTING MEDIATOR AND ALTERNATE MEDIATOR need to be signed by the parties or is the the signature of the attorneys of the parties sufficient?Thanks you, -- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.http://www.calibankruptcysite.com/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to
establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Does Form 702:
[PROPOSED] ORDER ASSIGNING MATTER TO MEDIATION PROGRAM AND APPOINTING
MEDIATOR AND ALTERNATE MEDIATOR
need to be signed by the parties or is the the signature of the attorneys
of the parties sufficient?
Thanks you,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Does Form 702:
[PROPOSED] ORDER ASSIGNING MATTER TO MEDIATION
PROGRAM AND APPOINTING MEDIATOR AND ALTERNATE MEDIATOR
need to be signed by the parties or is the the signature of the attorneys of the parties sufficient?Thanks you, -- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.