New Mailing Matrix form

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


charset="UTF-8"
The correct LBR is 1007-1(a)(3)(B) which states that signing is either by the debtor or atty for the debtor.
The master mailing list and any supplement must be accompanied by a
declaration by the debtor or debtors counsel attesting to the completeness
and correctness of the list
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
Pat
Patrick T. Green
Attorney at Law
Fitzgerald & Green, Attorneys at Law
1010 E. Union St. Suite 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: (626) 449-8433
Fax: (626) 449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Erick:
We do the same in our office as Dennis does, but in a less tech savy way. We simply copy over the attorney signature block before photocopying and filing. I will not sign a matrix for the same reason, I will not sign a Proof Of Claim on behalf of a client!
Raymond H. Aver, Esquire
Law Offices of Raymond H. Aver
A Professional Corporation
1950 Sawtelle Boulevard
Suite 120
Los Angeles, California 90025
Phone: (310) 571-3511
e-mail: ray@averlaw.com
On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:02 AM, "Erik Clark eclark@blclaw.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
Pardon me if this is a topic that has already been discussed but does anyone know the reasoning behind the December 2014 change to the mailing matrix form? It says that pursuant to LBR 1007-1(d), I am now certifying under penalty of perjury that the master mailing list is complete, correct, and consistent with Debtors schedules and I/we assume all responsibility for errors and omissions. That seems like a bit much. How do I know if my clients have not told me about a creditor, or left someone off.
I cannot find the new LBR 1007-1(d) on the courts website. This seems like a poorly thought out change. Anyone know anything about it?
M. Erik Clark
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.BorowitzClark.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
American Board of Certification
Erick:
We do the same in our office as Dennis does, but in a less tech savy way. We simply copy over the attorney signature block before photocopying and filing. I will not sign a matrix for the same reason, I will not sign a Proof Of Claim on behalf of a client!
Raymond H. Aver, Esquire
Law Offices of Raymond H. Aver
A Professional Corporation
1950 Sawtelle Boulevard
Suite 120
Los Angeles, California 90025
Phone: (310) 571-3511
e-mail: ray@averlaw.com
On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:02 AM, "Erik Clark eclark@blclaw.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Pardon me if this is a topic that has already been discussed but does anyone know the reasoning behind the December 2014 change to the mailing matrix form? It says that pursuant to LBR 1007-1(d), I am now certifying under penalty of perjury
that the master mailing list is complete, correct, and consistent with Debtors schedules and I/we assume all responsibility for errors and omissions. That seems like a bit much. How do I know if my clients have not told me about a creditor, or left
someone off.

I cannot find the new LBR 1007-1(d) on the courts website. This seems like a poorly thought out change. Anyone know anything about it?

M. Erik Clark
<image001.jpg>
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.BorowitzClark.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
American Board of Certification

creation-date="Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:02:45 GMT";
modification-date="Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:02:45 GMT"

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Erik:
The old form was similar. I have not signed one for about 5 years. I make the client sign them, but I actually open adobe and erase the /s/ on the attorney line. There is no way that an attorney can certify that all creditors are listed. We don't have crystal balls. Pun intended.
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Erik Clark eclark@blclaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Pardon me if this is a topic that has already been discussed but does anyone know the reasoning behind the December 2014 change to the mailing matrix form? It says that pursuant to LBR 1007-1(d), I am now certifying under penalty of perjury that the master mailing list is les and I/we assume all responsibility for errors and omissions. That seems like a bit much. How do I know if my clients have not told me about a creditor, or left someone off.
>
>
>
> I cannot find the new LBR 1007-1(d) on the courts website. This seems like a poorly thought out change. Anyone know anything about it?
>
>
>
> M. Erik Clark
>
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
>
> www.BorowitzClark.com
> Office: (626) 332-8600
> Fax: (626) 332-8644
> Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
> American Board of Certification
>
>
>
>
On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Erik Clark eclark@blclaw.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Pardon me if this is a topic that has already been discussed but does anyone know the reasoning behind the December 2014 change to the mailing matrix form? It says that pursuant to LBR 1007-1(d), I am now certifying under penalty of perjury that the master mailing list is I/we assume all responsibility for errors and omissions. That seems like a bit much. How do I know if my clients have not told me about a creditor, or left someone off. I cannot find the new LBR 1007-1(d) on the courts website. This seems like a poorly thought out change. Anyone know anything about it? M. Erik Clark<image001.jpg>100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250West Covina, CA 91791www.BorowitzClark.comOffice: (626) 332-8600Fax: (626) 332-8644Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy American Board of Certification

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm



The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Pardon me if this is a topic that has already been discussed but does
anyone know the reasoning behind the December 2014 change to the mailing
matrix form? It says that pursuant to LBR 1007-1(d), I am now certifying
under penalty of perjury that the master mailing list is complete,
correct, and consistent with Debtors schedules and I/we assume all
responsibility for errors and omissions. That seems like a bit much. How
do I know if my clients have not told me about a creditor, or left someone
off.
I cannot find the new LBR 1007-1(d) on the courts website. This seems
like a poorly thought out change. Anyone know anything about it?
M. Erik Clark
[image: BCLogoSmall]
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.BorowitzClark.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
American Board of Certification

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply