App for Order that Loan Mod discussion Will Not Viola=

Yahoo Bot · Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:24 am

I uploaded the Order when I filed the Motion and Notice and the Order was signed within the week. No wait time. I am not sure if this was a fluke or standard operating procedure for this issue.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] App for Order that Loan Mod discussion Will Not Violate Stay
LBR 9013-1 generally and LBR 9013-1(c)(2) specifically: "Every motion must be accompanied by written notice of motion"
Realistically, nobody will oppose your motion, but the judge might deny it if Notice is lacking.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Kenneth Jay Schwartz wrote:
>
>Kirk, do you have any authority other than this is the typical waiting period for "scream or die" motions? In reality, who would oppose the application?
>Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
>LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
>21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
>Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
>Telephone: (818) 226-1205
>Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
>
>
>
>
>THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
>Sent: Thu, November 8, 2012 1:41:07 PM
>Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] App for Order that Loan Mod discussion Will Not Violate Stay
>
>
>I believe the usual rules regarding Motions and Notice of motions apply.
>Therefore, the motion requires Notice.
>If you use "scream or die" notice, then you wait 14 days + 3 days if served by mail.
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Schwartz wrote:
>
>
>>
>>In making the Application (Form 4001-1.6) for an order that loan modification discussions will not violate the stay, do you have to wait any requisite periods before lodging the Order?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Kirk Brennan, esq.
>California Law Office, P.C.
>www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Yahoo Bot · Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:44 pm

Kirk, do you have any authority other than this is the typical waiting period
for "scream or die" motions? In reality, who would oppose the application?
Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
Telephone: (818) 226-1205
Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
THANK YOU.
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Thu, November 8, 2012 1:41:07 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] App for Order that Loan Mod discussion Will Not Violate
Stay
I believe the usual rules regarding Motions and Notice of motions apply.
Therefore, the motion requires Notice.
If you use "scream or die" notice, then you wait 14 days + 3 days if served by
mail.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Schwartz
wrote:
>
>In making the Application (Form 4001-1.6) for an order that loan modification
>discussions will not violate the stay, do you have to wait any requisite periods
>before lodging the Order?
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive
and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this
message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its
attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work
product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be
used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose
of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing
the signature of a director.
Kirk, do you have any authority other than this is the typical waiting period for "scream or die" motions? In reality, who would oppose the application? Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226Telephone: (818) 226-1205Facsimile : (818) 226-1213THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU
ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.From: Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com>To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>Sent: Thu, November 8, 2012 1:41:07 PMSubject: Re: [cdcbaa] App for Order that Loan Mod discussion Will Not
Violate Stay

I believe the usual rules regarding Motions and Notice of motions apply.Therefore, the motion requires Notice.If you use "scream or die" notice, then you wait 14 days + 3 days if served by mail.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Schwartz <kennethjschwartz@yahoo.com> wrote:

In making the Application (Form 4001-1.6) for an order that loan modification discussions will not violate the stay, do you have to wait any requisite periods before lodging the Order?
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.