Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

He probably doesn't have standing, but a large percent of the assets are
going to tee's attys (surprise) instead of to creditors.
Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Mark J. Markus wrote:
> **
>
>
> However, if one of the creditors is a friendly relative...
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4s
>
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Holly Roark wrote:
>
> That makes sense.
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Larry Simons wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> ** If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the
>> debtor lacks standing to object.
>>
>> *From*: Holly Roark [mailto:hollyroark22@gmail.com]
>> *Sent*: Friday, March 16, 2012 07:50 PM
>> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>> *Subject*: [cdcbaa] When Ch 7 trustee's firm eats up all the assets in
>> fees......
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chapter
>> 7 trustee). I don't know whether ch 7 Debtor's opinion matters much here,
>> but he's not happy that his dead mom's house was sold just to pay the
>> trustee's attorneys. (He had the option to do a chapter 13 but declined).
>> Anyway, he's not happy about the final fee application of the trustee's
>> attorneys since it appears the creditors will be left with little to
>> nothing.
>>
>> Opinions, samples, observations???
>>
>>
>> Holly Roark
>> holly@roarklawoffices.com
>> www.roarklawoffices.com
>> Central District of California
>> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
>> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
>> Los Angeles, CA 90067
>> T (310) 553-2600
>> F (310) 553-2601
>>
>>
>>
>
>
He probably doesn't have standing, but a large percent of the assets are going to tee's attys (surprise) instead of to creditors.Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Mark J. Markus <bklawr@yahoo.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

What are your grounds for the objection?
On Mar 16, 2012 7:50 PM, "Holly Roark" wrote:
> **
>
>
> Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chapter
> 7 trustee). I don't know whether ch 7 Debtor's opinion matters much here,
> but he's not happy that his dead mom's house was sold just to pay the
> trustee's attorneys. (He had the option to do a chapter 13 but declined).
> Anyway, he's not happy about the final fee application of the trustee's
> attorneys since it appears the creditors will be left with little to
> nothing.
>
> Opinions, samples, observations???
>
>
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
What are your grounds for the objection?
On Mar 16, 2012 7:50 PM, "Holly Roark" <hollyroark22@gmail.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

charset-ascii
However, if one of the creditors is a friendly relative...
Sent from my iPhone 4s
On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Holly Roark wrote:
>
>
> That makes sense.
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Larry Simons wrote:
>
> If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the debtor lacks standing to object.
>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 07:50 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] When Ch 7 trustee's firm eats up all the assets in fees......
>
>
> Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chapter 7 trustee). I don't know whether ch 7 Debtor's opinion matters much here, but he's not happy that his dead mom's house was sold just to pay the trustee's attorneys. (He had the option to do a chapter 13 but declined). Anyway, he's not happy about the final fee application of the trustee's attorneys since it appears the creditors will be left with little to nothing.
>
> Opinions, samples, observations???
>
>
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
>
>
However, if one of the creditors is a friendly relative...Sent from my iPhone 4sOn Mar 16, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Holly Roark <hollyroark22@gmail.com> wrote:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

That makes sense.
Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Larry Simons wrote:
> **
>
>
> ** If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the
> debtor lacks standing to object.
>
> *From*: Holly Roark [mailto:hollyroark22@gmail.com]
> *Sent*: Friday, March 16, 2012 07:50 PM
> *To*: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject*: [cdcbaa] When Ch 7 trustee's firm eats up all the assets in
> fees......
>
>
>
> Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chapter
> 7 trustee). I don't know whether ch 7 Debtor's opinion matters much here,
> but he's not happy that his dead mom's house was sold just to pay the
> trustee's attorneys. (He had the option to do a chapter 13 but declined).
> Anyway, he's not happy about the final fee application of the trustee's
> attorneys since it appears the creditors will be left with little to
> nothing.
>
> Opinions, samples, observations???
>
>
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
That makes sense.Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Larry Simons <larry@lsimonslaw.com> wrote:
If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the debtor lacks standing to object.
From: Holly Roark [mailto:hollyroark22@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 07:50 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com <
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chapter 7
trustee). I don't know whether ch 7 Debtor's opinion matters much here,
but he's not happy that his dead mom's house was sold just to pay the
trustee's attorneys. (He had the option to do a chapter 13 but declined).
Anyway, he's not happy about the final fee application of the trustee's
attorneys since it appears the creditors will be left with little to
nothing.
Opinions, samples, observations???
Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
Does anyone have a sample objection to professional fees (atty of chap
The post was migrated from Yahoo.