Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

P.S.,
Be careful doing something like this, (i.e., opposing a fee app motion)!!! If you lose, TE and attorneys just earned MORE $$$ FROM THE ESTATE!!!!
Sincerely,
Tyson M. Takeuchi, Esq.
Tyson M. Takeuchi
Certified
Bankruptcy Specialist*^
Law Offices of Tyson M. Takeuchi
1100
Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2606
Los Angeles, CA 90017
tel: (213)
637-1866
fax: (866) 481-3236
*By State Bar of California Board of
Legal Specialization
^Consumer Bankruptcy Specialist Certified by
American Board of Certification
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:19:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] When Ch 7 trustee's firm eats up all the assets in fees......
But debtor would have a pecuniary interest. Specially if taking from admins would go to debts that were otherwise non discharge able. Like taxes? Or set of to non discharge able debt?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:55 PM, "Larry Simons" wrote:
If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the debtor lacks standing to object.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Charles may be right. I've actually opposed a couple of fee apps based on this (i.e., funds should go to priority tax debt not ALL to Te and his attorneys.) I think in one or both matters we stipped to a lower $$$ amount, therefore allowing some or all priority tax debts to be paid out of estate funds.
WOW CHARLES! Your mind is still sharp even at 12:19 a.m.!!
Sincerely,
Tyson M. Takeuchi, Esq.
Tyson M. Takeuchi
Certified
Bankruptcy Specialist*^
Law Offices of Tyson M. Takeuchi
1100
Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2606
Los Angeles, CA 90017
tel: (213)
637-1866
fax: (866) 481-3236
*By State Bar of California Board of
Legal Specialization
^Consumer Bankruptcy Specialist Certified by
American Board of Certification
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:19:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] When Ch 7 trustee's firm eats up all the assets in fees......
But debtor would have a pecuniary interest. Specially if taking from admins would go to debts that were otherwise non discharge able. Like taxes? Or set of to non discharge able debt?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2012, at 7:55 PM, "Larry Simons" wrote:
If the case is not a surplus case, there is ample case law that the debtor lacks standing to object.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.