Page 1 of 1

keeping a ch 7 case open

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:38 am
by Yahoo Bot

Actually, I had two cases with two pending 522 motions that were discharged
and closed prior to resolution of the 522. Each case was reopen by the
court. Apparently the process for discharge and closing sometimes misses the
open 522 motion.
Best regards
Larry Webb
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Larry@webbklaw. com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

keeping a ch 7 case open

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:14 am
by Yahoo Bot

The court will not close a case with motions pending.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

keeping a ch 7 case open

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:11 am
by Yahoo Bot

Case won't close with motions pending despite the discharge having been entered.
Joseph E. Caceres, Esq.
Caceres & Shamash, LLP
8200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel: (310) 205-3400
Fax: (310) 878-8308
E-mail: jec@locs.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

keeping a ch 7 case open

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:10 am
by Yahoo Bot

I have a chapter 7 case with a couple of 522(f) motions pending.
The discharge order came through today, and I'm worried that the case will
be closed prior to resolution of the 522(f) motions.
Any suggestions on how to keep the case open?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
I have a chapter 7 case with a couple of 522(f) motions pending. The discharge order came through today, and I'm worried that the case will be closed prior to resolution of the 522(f) motions.Any suggestions on how to keep the case open?
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.