Thanks Christine. I usually use the RARA, but have an unusual case that
requires a fee app. After looking into it, I'm essentially mimicking my
chapter 11 fee app procedures, with some modification.
Best,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Christine Wilton wrote:
> **
>
>
> Kirk,
>
> You will likely find that very few practitioners will forego the RARA and
> note their detailed time and costs instead. I only know of one such
> practitioner down in Orange County who operates this way and she used to
> work at Mr. Cohen's office. I don't remember her name, or I would include
> it for you here.
>
> Also look at Section 330 as your fees MUST be reasonable. John
> Greifendorff in Garden Grove may know this attorney as he was the panel
> moderator at an MCLE where she was a speaker in Orange County.
>
> All the best, Christine
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> If an attorney chooses to file a fee application in a chapter 13 case
>> instead of using the RARA flat fee arrangement, does LBR 2016-1 apply?
>> If any of you have done one before, are you willing to chat about it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>>
www.calibankruptcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>> message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
> Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
>
> *Office:*
> 5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17F
> Lakewood, CA 90712
>
> *Mailing:*
> 4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
> Lakewood, CA 90712
>
> Office: 877-631-2220
> Cell: 562-824-7563
> Fax: 1-636-212-7078
> Email:
attorneychristine@gmail.com
> Web:
www.attorneychristine.com
> Blog:
www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
> ***************************
> Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
> is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
> intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
> PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
> communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
> Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
> in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
> be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
> be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
> to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Thanks Christine. I usually use the RARA, but have an unusual case that requires a fee app. After looking into it, I'm essentially mimicking my chapter 11 fee app procedures, with some modification.Best,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Christine Wilton <
attorneychristine@gmail.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.