Court's staff said that judge accepts either Ex Parte motion for Default
Judgment or setting the motion for hearing.
Anyone do the Ex Parte procedure before? Seems rather unusual for this
type of motion ...
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Jason Wallach
wrote:
> **
>
>
> Better to check judge's webpage, and then chambers.
> Ideally, if Judge doesn't like the procedure, would set it for hearing and
> order you to re-notice it.
> Jason
> Jason Wallach
>
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
>
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 9:19 PM, John D. Faucher wrote:
>
>
>
> I would just assume that you can do it, and let the court tell you no by
> denying your order when you file it.
>
> John D. Faucher
> Faucher & Associates
> *818/889-8080*
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Anybody know the answer to this?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>>
>>> Can a motion for default judgment be filed on negative notice (scream or
>>> die)?
>>> LBR 9013-1(o) doesn't say it's prohibited, but I would like to be sure.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>>> California Law Office, P.C.
>>>
www.calibankruptcysite.com
>>>
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>>> message.
>>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>> message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Court's staff said that judge accepts either Ex Parte motion for Default Judgment or setting the motion for hearing.Anyone do the Ex Parte procedure before? Seems rather unusual for this type of motion ...
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Jason Wallach <
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:
Better to check judge's webpage, and then chambers.Ideally, if Judge doesn't like the procedure, would set it for hearing and order you to re-notice it.Jason
The post was migrated from Yahoo.