Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

The Key Word in that quote is "VALID."
Apparently, if it's recorded, it's valid. If a lender says so, it's
valid. The best way to clean up a huge chunk of this mess is to let the
people Short Sell! Get a BFP on the table and move title to that innocent
and precious buyer and it's shiny and clean again.
It's impossible to see a result after foreclosure! Even the few attorneys
I knew who were doing this work, shifted their practice.
Christine Wilton
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matt Resnik wrote:
> **
>
>
> It would be interesting to know the history (or lobbyists in support) of
> the nonjudicial foreclosures. When reading this case, it appears that we
> have waived any right to challenge who has the right to foreclose. And even
> admits that partial compliance is the low standard the Trustees and Lenders
> need to reach in order to go forward with the foreclosure. Hard to sue
> after you lost the house.
>
> "nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings are intended to be
> less expensive and more quickly concluded, therefore [t]he
> recognition of the right to bring a lawsuit to determine a
> nominees authorization to proceed with foreclosure on behalf of
> the noteholder would fundamentally undermine the nonjudicial
> nature of the process and introduce the possibility of lawsuits
> filed solely for the purpose of delaying valid foreclosures.
> Gomes, 192 Cal. App. 4th at 1155"
>
> Hence - no real reason to have a Judge determine if there ever is
> compliance....so long as they are inexpensive and quickly concluded....
>
> ------------------------------
> *To: *cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 1, 2012 3:36:07 PM
> *Subject: *RE: [cdcbaa] In re Humberto Cedano, 2012 DAR 5531 (5/1/12) -
> BAP # CC-11-1189 HKiMk
>
>
>
> The last time I looked the BAP had all their decisions on their site
> except the one I was looking for. Google 9th circuit bap.
>
>
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> Patrick T. Green
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> Fitzgerald & Green
>
> 1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
>
> Pasadena, CA 91106
>
> Tel: 626-449-8433
>
> Fax: 626-449-0565
>
> pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogr oups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Kirk Brennan
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:42 PM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] In re Humberto Cedano, 2012 DAR 5531 (5/1/12) -
> BAP # CC-11-1189 HKiMk
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm having a hard time pulling this up on PACER. Finding the main case
> but not the BAP case. Is there a special procedure for pulling up BAP
> cases?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:42 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> 9th Cir. BAP affirms Judge Mund's dismissal of wrongful foreclosure
> adversary proceeding brought by debtor in chapter 13 case. Good discussion
> of when tender required , MERS authority, standing of substitute trustee to
> foreclose and 2923.5 notice.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
> Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
>
> 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
>
> Torrance, California 90503
>
> (310) 792-5864; 792-5866 (fax)
>
> MitnickLaw@aol.com
>
>
>
> Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any
> virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it
> is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for
> any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
> *
> The information contained in this email message and any attached files may
> be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is
> strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message
> in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the email
> message you received and all of the attached files.*
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
>
> --
> *****PLEASE NOTE - WE HAVE A NEW DOWNTOWN ADDRESS*****
>
> Matthew D. Resnik
> Attorney at Law
>
> Los Angeles Office - Downtown
>
> Simon and Resnik LLP
> 510 W. Sixth Street
> Suite 1220
> Los Angeles, Ca 90014
> T:213-572-0800
> F: 213-572-0860
> Matt@resniklaw.com
> www.simonresnik.com
>
> San Fernando Valley - Sherman Oaks
> Simon & Resnik, LLP
> 15233 Ventura Boulevard
> Suite 300
> Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
> P: 818-783-6251 #2
> F: 818-827-4919
>
>
>
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
*Office:*
5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17F
Lakewood, CA 90712
*Mailing:*
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
The Key Word in that quote is "VALID."Apparently, if it&#
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I'm having a hard time pulling this up on PACER. Finding the main case but
not the BAP case. Is there a special procedure for pulling up BAP cases?
Thanks,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:42 AM, wrote:
> **
>
>
> 9th Cir. BAP affirms Judge Mund's dismissal of wrongful foreclosure
> adversary proceeding brought by debtor in chapter 13 case. Good discussion
> of when tender required , MERS authority, standing of substitute trustee to
> foreclose and 2923.5 notice.
> Eric
>
>
> Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
> 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
> Torrance, California 90503
> (310) 792-5864; 792-5866 (fax)
> MitnickLaw@aol.com
>
> Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any
> virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it
> is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
> that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for
> any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
> *
> The information contained in this email message and any attached files may
> be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is
> strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message
> in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the email
> message you received and all of the attached files.*
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
I'm having a hard time pulling this up on PACER. Finding the main case but not the BAP case. Is there a special procedure for pulling up BAP cases?Thanks,On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:42 AM, <mitnicklaw@aol.com> wrote:
9th Cir. BAP affirms Judge Mund's dismissal of wrongful foreclosure adversary proceeding brought by debtor in chapter 13 case. Good discussion of when tender required , MERS authority, standingof substitute trustee to foreclose and 2923.5 notice.
Eric
Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
Torrance, California 90503
(310) 792-5864; 792-5866 (fax)
MitnickLaw@aol.com
Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
The information contained in this email message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the email message you received and all of the attached files.
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.