.jpg)
motion for default judgment [1 Attachment]
No Notice with that?
Thanks Wes
On Mar 11, 2013 6:49 PM, "Wesley H. Avery" wrote:
> **
>
> [Attachment(s) from Wesley H. Avery included
> below]
>
> Kirk:****
>
> ** **
>
> With Judge Kwan, simply label the Motion Ex Parte and file without a
> hearing but reference the next status conference on the caption page.
> Sample attached.****
>
> ** **
>
> Wes****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Wesley H. Avery**
> Wesley H. Avery, Esq.
> Roquemore, Pringle & Moore, Inc.*
> *6055 E. Washington Blvd., Ste. 500*
> *Los Angeles, CA 90040-2466*
> *wavery@rpmlaw.com*
> *http://www.rpmlaw.com*
> *(323) 724-3117 (office)*
> *(323) 724-5410 (fax)* **
>
> *Law Offices of Wesley H. Avery, APC
> 28005 Smyth Drive, Ste. 125
> Valencia, CA 91355-4023
> wavery@thebankruptcylawcenter.com
> http://www.thebankruptcylawcenter.com
> (661) 295-4673 (direct)
> (661) 295-4674 (office)
> (661) 430-5467 (fax)
> (661) 618-7376 (cell) *
>
> [image: cid:part1.03050307.05030101@bklaw.com]
> *
> Certified Specialist*
> *Bankruptcy Law*
> *State Bar of California
>
> Board Certified*
> *Business Bankruptcy Law*
> *American Board of Certification* ****
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail
> transmission is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
> above. This e-mail transmission , and any documents, files, previous
> e-mail transmissions or other information attached to it, may contain
> confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other use of this
> transmission or any of the information contained in or attached to it is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in
> error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission or by
> telephone at (661) 618-7376, and destroy the original e-mail transmission
> and its attachments without reading it or saving it in any manner. Thank
> you.****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, March 11, 2013 5:54 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Re: motion for default judgment****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Court's staff said that judge accepts either Ex Parte motion for Default
> Judgment or setting the motion for hearing.****
>
> Anyone do the Ex Parte procedure before? Seems rather unusual for this
> type of motion ...****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Jason Wallach jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:****
>
> ****
>
> Better to check judge's webpage, and then chambers.****
>
> Ideally, if Judge doesn't like the procedure, would set it for hearing and
> order you to re-notice it.****
>
> Jason****
>
> Jason Wallach****
>
> jwallach@gladstonemichel.com****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 9:19 PM, John D. Faucher wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> I would just assume that you can do it, and let the court tell you no by
> denying your order when you file it. ****
>
>
> ****
>
> *John D. Faucher *****
>
> *Faucher & Associates*****
>
> *818/889-8080*****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kirk Brennan
> wrote:****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Anybody know the answer to this?****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Kirk Brennan
> wrote:****
>
> Can a motion for default judgment be filed on negative notice (scream or
> die)?****
>
> LBR 9013-1(o) doesn't say it's prohibited, but I would like to be sure.***
> *
>
> Thanks,
> ****
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> -- ****
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
>
>
> -- ****
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
>
>
No Notice with that?
Thanks Wes
On Mar 11, 2013 6:49 PM, "Wesley H. Avery" <wavery@rpmlaw.com> wrote:
[Attachment(s) from Wesley H. Avery included below]
Kirk:
With Judge Kwan, simply label the Motion Ex Parte and file without a hearing but reference the next status conference on the caption page. Sample attached.
Wes
Wesley H. Avery
Wesley H. Avery, Esq.
Roquemore, Pringle & Moore, Inc.
6055 E. Washington Blvd., Ste. 500
Los Angeles, CA 90040-2466
wavery@rpmlaw.com
http://www.rpmlaw.com
(323) 724-3117 (office)
(323) 724-5410 (fax)
Law Offices of WesleyH. Avery, APC
28005 Smyth Drive, Ste. 125
Valencia, CA 91355-4023
wavery@thebankruptcylawcenter.com
http://www.thebankruptcylawcenter.com
(661) 295-4673 (direct)
(661) 295-4674 (office)
(661) 430-5467 (fax)
(661) 618-7376 (cell)
Certified Specialist
Bankruptcy Law
State Bar of California
Board Certified
Business Bankruptcy Law
American Board of Certification
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail transmission is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. This e-mail transmission , and any documents,
files, previous e-mail transmissions or other information attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying, or other use of this transmission or any of the information contained in or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission
in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission or by telephone at (661) 618-7376, and destroy the original e-mail transmission and its attachments without reading it or saving it in any manner.
From: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:54 PM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Re: motion for default judgment
Court's staff said that judge accepts either Ex Parte motion for Default Judgment or setting the motion for hearing.
Anyone do the Ex Parte procedure before? Seems rather unusual for this type of motion ...
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Jason Wallach <jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:
Better to check judge's webpage, and then chambers.
Ideally, if Judge doesn't like the procedure, would set it for hearing and order you to re-notice it.
Jason
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
On Mar 6, 2013, at 9:19 PM, John D. Faucher wrote:
I would just assume that you can do it, and let the court tell you no by denying your order when you file it.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.