Page 1 of 1

Workers Comp Audit

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:39 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Prepetition obligation. If he had overpaid the refund would be a
prepetition asset.
Mark T. Jessee
Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
"A Debt Relief Agency"
50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
(805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENTOF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED TO BE PRIVILEGED BY
LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION,DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE
NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THISMESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
In a message dated 11/28/2012 7:35:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
gm@mcesq.com writes:
This is probably a dumb question, but I have to ask anyway.
Client files for Chapter 7 relief. Before the filing, all his workers arelaid off.
The State Workers Comp Fund audits his workers comp records 2 weeks afterhis discharge. All of the work took place before the petition date. Butbecause the audit didnt take place before the petition date, the client didn
Is this a case where the debt relates back to when the work was performedand the obligation incurred? Or is it that since the audit was
post-petition, its non-dischargeable?
Gerry
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipientof the transmission and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this email in error, and review, use, dis semination, distributionor copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us
immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message and any
and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in advancefor your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.&nb sp;
Prepetition obligation. If he had overpaid the refund would be aprepetition asset.

Mark T.
JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief Agency"50 W.Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805) 497-5868 (805)
497-5864 (Facsimile)NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY
THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED
TO BE PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE,
DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE
THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

In a message dated 11/28/2012 7:35:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
gm@mcesq.com writes:



This is probably a dumb question, but I have to ask
anyway.

Client files for Chapter 7 relief. Before the
filing, all his workers are laid off.

The State Workers Comp Fund audits his workers comp
records 2 weeks after his discharge. All of the work took place before
the petition date. But because the audit didnt take place before the
petition date, the client didnt list them.

Is this a case where the debt relates back to when
the work was performed and the obligation incurred? Or is it that since
the audit was post-petition, its non-dischargeable?

Gerry


The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Workers Comp Audit

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:35 pm
by Yahoo Bot

This is probably a dumb question, but I have to ask anyway.
Client files for Chapter 7 relief. Before the filing, all his workers
are laid off.
The State Workers Comp Fund audits his workers comp records 2 weeks
after his discharge. All of the work took place before the petition
date. But because the audit didn't take place before the petition
date, the client didn't list them.
Is this a case where the debt relates back to when the work was
performed and the obligation incurred? Or is it that since the audit
was post-petition, it's non-dischargeable?
Gerry
McNally Bus Card Smaller
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended
recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privileged by
law. If you received this email in error, and review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email
and please delete this message and any and all duplicates of this
message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S.
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments)
is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
addressed herein.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.