.jpg)
OUST NOTICE
Also see the other email with the attachment
This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:33 PM, David Jacob wrote:
> Go with Wolkowitz.
> I copied it straight from the notice I received at Figueroa. It is hard to know which info to trust but I would stick with the trustee.
>
> David
>
> This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
>
> On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Nicholas Gebelt wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear David,
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you reverse the dates of continuation? I received a call this morning from Ed Wolkowitzs office telling me that my clients December 24 meeting of creditors has been continued to January 17, not January 10. After reading your post, I called Eds office to confirm the January 17 date, and was assured that the hearing was continued to January 17.
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
>>
>> Board Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
>>
>> 15150 Hornell Street
>>
>> Whittier, CA 90604
>>
>> Phone: 562.777.9159
>>
>> FAX: 562.946.1365
>>
>> Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
>>
>> Web: www.goodbye2debt.com
>>
>> Blog: www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 562.777.9159 or e-mail info@gebeltlaw.com and destroy the original message and all copies.
>>
>>
>>
>> Representation Note: If you have not signed a contract of representation, the Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt do not represent you, and this email does not contain any legal advice for you.
>>
>>
>>
>> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>>
>>
>>
f David Jacob
>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 1:38 PM
>> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [cdcbaa] OUST NOTICE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ALL CASES SCHEDULED FOR 12/24
>>
>> in LA will be continued.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed Wolkowitz cases continued to Jan 10th
>>
>> Carolyn Dye cases continued to Jan 17th
>>
>>
>>
>> Hearing times are the same.
>>
>> This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Easky2 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes write a letter saying client is bk and cannot pay storage bank must protect its own collateral
>>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>
>> >Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Stephen Stern, Esq.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stephen Stern, Esq.
>>
>>
>
>
Also see the other email with the attachmentThis message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:33 PM, David Jacob <david@dpjacob.com> wrote:
Go with Wolkowitz. I copied it straight from the notice I received at Figueroa. It is hard to know which info to trust but I would stick with the trustee. DavidThis message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Nicholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com> wrote:
Dear David,
Did you reverse the dates of continuation? I received a call this morning from Ed Wolkowitzs office telling me that my clients December 24 meeting of creditors
has been continued to January 17, not January 10. After reading your post, I called Eds office to confirm the January 17 date, and was assured that the hearing was continued to January 17.
All the best,
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
Board Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
<image001.jpg>
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
15150 Hornell Street
Whittier, CA 90604
Phone: 562.777.9159
FAX: 562.946.1365
Email:
ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com;
ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
Web:
www.goodbye2debt.com
Blog:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Go with Wolkowitz.
I copied it straight from the notice I received at Figueroa. It is hard to know which info to trust but I would stick with the trustee.
David
This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Nicholas Gebelt wrote:
> Dear David,
>
>
>
> Did you reverse the dates of continuation? I received a call this morning from Ed Wolkowitzs office telling me that my clients December 24 meeting of creditors has been continued to January 17, not January 10. After reading your post, I called Eds office to confirm the January 17 date, and was assured that the hearing was continued to January 17.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
>
> Board Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
>
> 15150 Hornell Street
>
> Whittier, CA 90604
>
> Phone: 562.777.9159
>
> FAX: 562.946.1365
>
> Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
>
> Web: www.goodbye2debt.com
>
> Blog: www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/
>
>
>
> We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 562.777.9159 or e-mail info@gebeltlaw.com and destroy the original message and all copies.
>
>
>
> Representation Note: If you have not signed a contract of representation, the Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt do not represent you, and this email does not contain any legal advice for you.
>
>
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
>
>
David Jacob
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 1:38 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] OUST NOTICE
>
>
>
>
>
> ALL CASES SCHEDULED FOR 12/24
>
> in LA will be continued.
>
>
>
> Ed Wolkowitz cases continued to Jan 10th
>
> Carolyn Dye cases continued to Jan 17th
>
>
>
> Hearing times are the same.
>
> This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Easky2 wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes write a letter saying client is bk and cannot pay storage bank must protect its own collateral
>
> Stephen wrote:
>
> >Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Stephen Stern, Esq.
> >
>
>
>
> Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen Stern, Esq.
>
>
>
Go with Wolkowitz. I copied it straight from the notice I received at Figueroa. It is hard to know which info to trust but I would stick with the trustee. DavidThis message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Nicholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com> wrote:
Dear David,
Did you reverse the dates of continuation? I received a call this morning from Ed Wolkowitzs office telling me that my clients December 24 meeting of creditors
has been continued to January 17, not January 10. After reading your post, I called Eds office to confirm the January 17 date, and was assured that the hearing was continued to January 17.
All the best,
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
Board Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
<image001.jpg>
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
15150 Hornell Street
Whittier, CA 90604
Phone: 562.777.9159
FAX: 562.946.1365
Email:
ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com;
ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
Web:
www.goodbye2debt.com
Blog:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
ALL CASES SCHEDULED FOR 12/24
in LA will be continued.
Ed Wolkowitz cases continued to Jan 10th
Carolyn Dye cases continued to Jan 17th
Hearing times are the same.
This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Easky2 wrote:
> Yes write a letter saying client is bk and cannot pay storage bank must protect its own collateral
>
> Stephen wrote:
>
> >Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Stephen Stern, Esq.
> >
>
> Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen Stern, Esq.
>
>
ALL CASES SCHEDULED FOR 12/24in LA will be continued. Ed Wolkowitz cases continued to Jan 10th Carolyn Dye cases continued to Jan 17thHearing times are the same. This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy, or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Easky2 <
Yes write a letter saying client is bk and cannot pay storage bank must protect its own collateral
Stephen <legalsos4u@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Stephen Stern, Esq.
>
Client is holding a few thousand dollars worth of various music products secured by an SBA loan through a local bank. The inventory was noted on the petition, and we have had a few phone calls with bank...but bank is not responding with offer to repurchase equipment or to pick-up. Debtor no longer wants to pay for shed to store product. Is there some abandonment issues that interplay if bank fails to collect? Is a demand letter to collect or abandon with minimum time frame appropriate?
Thanks,
Stephen Stern, Esq.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.