I was told by one of Curry's attorneys that the trustee will pay late filed
claims unless they are disallowed via the objections process.
On Jan 26, 2013 8:05 PM, "Jay Fleischman" wrote:
> **
>
>
> We do in NY, though our trustees simply don't pay them anyway. Late claim
> isn't allowed.
> On Jan 26, 2013 7:27 PM, "Kirk Brennan" wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> chapter 13:
>> Where a debt is not disputed, but the creditor files the proof of claim
>> past the deadline for filing proofs of claim, are any of you objecting
>> based on tardiness? If so, how are judges responding?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>>
www.calibankruptcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>> message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>
>
I was told by one of Curry's attorneys that the trustee will pay late filed claims unless they are disallowed via the objections process.
On Jan 26, 2013 8:05 PM, "Jay Fleischman" <
bankruptcy@gmail.com> wrote:
We do in NY, though our trustees simply don't pay them anyway. Late claim isn't allowed.
On Jan 26, 2013 7:27 PM, "Kirk Brennan" <
kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
chapter 13:Where a debt is not disputed, but the creditor files the proof of claim past the deadline for filing proofs of claim, are any of you objecting based on tardiness? If so, how are judges responding?
Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.