.jpg)
Old Case
I think this is the correct cite: Beezley v. California Land Title Co. (In re Beezley), 994 F.2d 1433, 1434 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) While usually cited for the proposition you state, the case primarily said there is no need to file a motion to reopen a case and schedule an omitted creditor in a no asset case.
>
> What is the name of the 9th Cir Bap case that says in effect that even an unscheduled creditor is discharged in a no asset chapter 7 case, unless the basis of the claim is non-dischargeable.
> My old brain tells me it is In re Beeney, 142 BR. 360, but that is a different issue.
> Thanks.
> Jason
>
> Jason Wallach
> jwallach@...
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
in re Beezley
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Jason Wallach wrote:
> **
>
>
> What is the name of the 9th Cir Bap case that says in effect that even an
> unscheduled creditor is discharged in a no asset chapter 7 case, unless the
> basis of the claim is non-dischargeable.
> My old brain tells me it is In re Beeney, 142 BR. 360, but that is a
> different issue.
> Thanks.
> Jason
>
> Jason Wallach
> jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
>
>
>
**
Lesley B. Davis, Esq.
Lesley Davis Law
6520 Platt Avenue #356
West Hills, CA 91307-3218
lesleydavislaw@gmail.com
424-234-3558 Direct
818-337-2191 Fax
Not intended as a substitute for a writing. Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act or the applicability of any other law of
similar substance or effect, absent an express statement to the contrary
hereinabove, this email message, its contents, and any attachments hereto
are not intended to represent an offer or acceptance to enter into a
contract and are not otherwise intended to bind the sender, Lesley Davis
Law, any of its clients, or any other person or entity.
This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
attorney-client privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify Lesley Davis Law immediately by telephone at (424) 234-3558 or by
e-mail to lesleydavislaw@gmail.com and destroy all copies of this message
and any attachments.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed
by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
in re BeezleyOn Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Jason Wallach <jwallach@gladstonemichel.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
What is the name of the 9th Cir Bap case that says in effect that even an unscheduled creditor is discharged in a no asset chapter 7 case, unless the basis of the claim is non-dischargeable.
My old brain tells me it is In re Beeney, 142 BR. 360, but that is a different issue.
Thanks.
Jason
Jason Wallach
jwallach@gladstonemichel.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.