Issuing Subpoenas (subpoenae?)
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:43 am
So presumably a motion would qualify.
On Apr 28, 2017 6:07 AM, "AttyChristine attorneychristine@gmail.com
[cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
> You only need a "contested matter" to invoke the power.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 9:33 AM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> For our more litigation oriented members...
>
> Do we as attorneys have the ability to issue subpoenas in the absence of
> an adversary proceeding?
>
> I've been trying to get AMEX to send back statements requested by the
> Trustee in a (now) Chapter 13 case and they have essentially stated the
> only way they will produce them is via subpoena.
>
> I seem to recall in my distant past being able to do this in connection
> with a bankruptcy case, but that might have been only in a Chapter 11 where
> I was representing the DIP.
>
> Anyone know? I realize I can put the onus on the actual Ch. 13 trustee to
> do this, but I just wondered if I could do it without an adversary.
>
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> *Mailing Address Only:*
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of
> Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office
> of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for
> the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
> disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
> prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
> the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
> communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
> and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
So presumably a motion would qualify.On Apr 28, 2017 6:07 AM, "AttyChristine attorneychristine@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
You only need a "contested matter" to invoke the power. Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 27, 2017,
The post was migrated from Yahoo.