Page 1 of 1

Renewed motion

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:21 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Perhaps 9013-1(l) would work as an altermative.
On Jun 16, 2017 3:04 PM, "Kirk Brennan" wrote:
> If your right, that seems like a high standard.
>
> On Jun 16, 2017 2:27 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> First, thanks for identifying the provision which I was thinking about.
>
> A motion is a contested matter, so I think the provision applies.
>
> The Court actually made a ruling on the motion, i.e. deny (regardless of
> the reason), so I think the rule applies.
>
> If the motion had been taken off calendar or withdraw, perhaps not.
>
>
>
> Happy to hear contrary reasoning.
>
>
>
> *David A. Tilem*
>
> *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997*
>
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem
>
> 206 N. Jackson St., #201
>
> Glendale, CA 91206
>
> Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
>
>
> Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648 )
>
> www.TilemLaw.com
>
>
>
> [image: square-facebook-24] [image:
> square-twitter-24] [image:
> square-linkedin-24]
> [image:
> square-google-plus-24]
>
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image005.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image:
> cid:image006.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image: SL]
>
> [image: AVVO]
>
> [image: av]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The pages comprising this transmission may contain CONFIDENTIAL
> INFORMATION from Law Offices of David A. Tilem. This information is
> intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient
> hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
> transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange and
> correct this transmission.
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 1:27 PM
>
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* RE: [cdcbaa] Renewed motion
>
>
>
>
>
> LBR 9013-4 covers new trial or hearing on contested matters but doesnt
> seem directly on point.
>
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2017 3:45 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Local Rules require that you identify prior motions related to the same
> subject. Probably part of 9013, but I cant specifically recall where at
> this moment.
>
>
>
> *David A. Tilem*
>
> *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997*
>
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem
>
> 206 N. Jackson St., #201
>
> Glendale, CA 91206
>
> Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
>
>
> Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648 )
>
> www.TilemLaw.com
>
>
>
> [image: square-facebook-24] [image:
> square-twitter-24] [image:
> square-linkedin-24]
> [image:
> square-google-plus-24]
>
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image005.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image:
> cid:image006.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image: SL]
>
> [image: AVVO]
>
> [image: av]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The pages comprising this transmission may contain CONFIDENTIAL
> INFORMATION from Law Offices of David A. Tilem. This information is
> intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient
> hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
> transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange and
> correct this transmission.
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:14 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Renewed motion
>
>
>
>
>
> When a motion is denied without prejudice for failure of movant to appear
> at the hearing (failure to prosecute), if movant wants to file the motion
> again does the title if the motion remain the same? Or is language such as
> "renewed motion" get used?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
Perhaps 9013-1(l) would work as an altermative.On Jun 16, 2017 3:04 PM, "Kirk Brennan" <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:If your right, that seems like a high standard.On Jun 16, 2017 2:27 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Renewed motion

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:04 pm
by Yahoo Bot

If your right, that seems like a high standard.
On Jun 16, 2017 2:27 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
First, thanks for identifying the provision which I was thinking about.
A motion is a contested matter, so I think the provision applies.
The Court actually made a ruling on the motion, i.e. deny (regardless of
the reason), so I think the rule applies.
If the motion had been taken off calendar or withdraw, perhaps not.
Happy to hear contrary reasoning.
*David A. Tilem*
*Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem
206 N. Jackson St., #201
Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648 )
www.TilemLaw.com
[image: square-facebook-24] [image:
square-twitter-24] [image:
square-linkedin-24]
[image:
square-google-plus-24]
[image: cid:image005.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image:
cid:image006.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image: SL]

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Renewed motion

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:27 pm
by Yahoo Bot

LBR 9013-4 covers new trial or hearing on contested matters but doesnt seem
directly on point.
On Jun 15, 2017 3:45 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
> Local Rules require that you identify prior motions related to the same
> subject. Probably part of 9013, but I cant specifically recall where at
> this moment.
>
>
>
> *David A. Tilem*
>
> *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997*
>
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem
>
> 206 N. Jackson St., #201
>
> Glendale, CA 91206
>
> Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
>
>
> Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648 )
>
> www.TilemLaw.com
>
>
>
> [image: square-facebook-24] [image:
> square-twitter-24] [image:
> square-linkedin-24]
> [image:
> square-google-plus-24]
>
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image005.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image:
> cid:image006.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [image: SL]
>
> [image: AVVO]
>
> [image: av]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The pages comprising this transmission may contain CONFIDENTIAL
> INFORMATION from Law Offices of David A. Tilem. This information is
> intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient
> hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
> transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange and
> correct this transmission.
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:14 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Renewed motion
>
>
>
>
>
> When a motion is denied without prejudice for failure of movant to appear
> at the hearing (failure to prosecute), if movant wants to file the motion
> again does the title if the motion remain the same? Or is language such as
> "renewed motion" get used?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
LBR 9013-4 covers new trial or hearing on contested matters but doesnt seem directly on point.On Jun 15, 2017 3:45 PM, "David Tilem DavidTilem@TilemLaw.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Local Rules require that you identify prior motions related to the same subject. Probably part of 9013, but I can
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997
Law Offices of David A. Tilem
206 N. Jackson St., #201
Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648)
www.TilemLaw.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Renewed motion

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:13 pm
by Yahoo Bot

When a motion is denied without prejudice for failure of movant to appear
at the hearing (failure to prosecute), if movant wants to file the motion
again does the title if the motion remain the same? Or is language such as
"renewed motion" get used?
Thanks,
When a motion is denied without prejudice for failure of movant to appear at the hearing (failure to prosecute), if movant wants to file the motion again does the title if the motion remain the same? Or is language such as "renewed motion" get used?Thanks,

The post was migrated from Yahoo.