Ch. 11: Using ex-spouse DSO obligation as consenting impaired class
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 11:18 pm
Mark:
I agree, but don't believe too many judges would consider ex's relatives. I've seen to many that hate each other.
It is a little weird, but some perceptive judges may see that if the ex has a support claim, the ex is better off to accept the plan, but ex's are not generally insiders, too much hate.
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 7:45 PM, 'Mark J. Markus' bklawr@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Thanks. My concern was the use of the word "includes" in 101(31). That's not an all-inclusive list, so a judge could theoretically find an Ex to be an Insider regardless of the degree of consanguinity. (I really wanted to use that word)
>
>> On 8/24/2015 6:08 PM, easky1@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>> Mark:
>>
>> you can use ex, if no kids. 101(31) insider relative 101(45) relative is within three degrees. debtor to child one degree, back up to ex is just two degrees.
>>
>> d
>
>
> --
>
> *************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> Mailing Address Only:
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
type="text/html";
boundaryple-Mail-6E46122C-B758-4512-8336-8A7E28E288ED
The post was migrated from Yahoo.