Page 1 of 1

Is it mandatory to reopen a Chapter 7 to file an

Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:21 pm
by Yahoo Bot

You need to reopen the case.  There just is no filing fee to reopen
for a 523 action.
On 9/5/2017 4:31 PM, R Grace Rodriguez rgracelaw@gmail.com [cdcbaa]
wrote:
>
>
> In re Menk says no need to reopen BK in order to file a 523 action
> . . .  is this correct?
>
> "The linchpin of our mootness analysis is that exercising
> jurisdiction pursuant to the "arising under" clause of 28 U.S.C. §
> 1334(b) to determine whether a debt is excepted from discharge
> does not require that the closed bankruptcy case first be reopened
> under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a). Reopening is irrelevant to the
> bankruptcy court's jurisdiction to determine whether a debt is
> excepted from discharge. Hence, no effective relief could be
> fashioned if we were to reverse the reopening.
>
> Court said. . . .
>
> "We have repeatedly held that the reopening of a closed bankruptcy
> case is a ministerial act that functions primarily to enable the
> file to be managed by the clerk as an active matter and that, by
> itself, lacks independent legal significance and determines
> nothing with respect to the merits of the case. /E.g., DeVore v.
> Marshack (In re DeVore),/223 B.R 193
> , 198 (9th Cir. BAP
> 1998); /Abbott v. Daff (In re Abbott),/183 B.R. 198
> , 200 (9th Cir. BAP
> 1995); /United States v. Germaine (In re Germaine),/152 B.R. 619
> , 624 (9th Cir. BAP
> 1993)."
>
> SEE:
>
>
> IN RE MENK
>
> Email
> |
> Print
> |
> Comments (0)
>
> BAP No. SC-98-1816-KRyB. Bankruptcy No. 95-14067. Adversary No.
> 97-90319.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * View Case
>
> * Cited Cases
>
> * Citing Case
>
>
> 241 B.R. 896 (1999)
>
> In re Wolfgang M. MENK, Debtor. Wolfgang M. Menk, Appellant, v.
> Michael J. Lapaglia and Temecula Ready Mix, Inc., Appellees.
>
> United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.
>
> Argued and Submitted May 20, 1999.
>
> Decided November 5, 1999.
>
>
> ​
> R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
> Full service Real Estate Attorney &​
> California State Bar​
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
> OFF: (818) 734-7223
> CEL: (818) 554-9922
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL:  I do not
> accept notice for /Ex Parte/ Applications via voicemail or by
> email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a
> person in my office during regular business hours.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:   This message contains privileged and
> confidential information and is intended only for the individual
> named. If you are not the intended recipient you should not
> disseminate, distribute, store, print, copy or deliver this
> message. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you
> have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from
> your system.
>
> This message, electronic transmission, and any documents attached
> hereto are protected by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act
> (18 USC §§ 2510-2522) and are intended solely for the named
> recipient(s) and authorized agent(s).
>
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To comply with requirements imposed
> by the Department of the Treasury,  we  inform  you  that  any
>  U.S.  tax  advice  contained  in  this  communication (including
>  any attachments) is not intended or written by the practitioner
> to be used, and that it cannot be used by any taxpayer,  for  the
>  purpose  of  (i)  avoiding  penalties  that  may  be  imposed on
>  the  taxpayer,  and  (ii) supporting the promotion or marketing
> of any transactions or matters addressed herein.
>
>
>
>
>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>
>
>
>
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
_*Mailing Address Only:*_
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of
the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.