Page 1 of 1

CH. 13: Objecting to claim after payout

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:50 am
by Yahoo Bot

Thanks. Good to know.  I had no idea being dilatory could be
profitable. :)
On 11/18/2017 9:41 AM, Havkin Stella havkinlaw@earthlink.net
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> Yes.  But if not you can file a motion for turnover.  I did it,
> won and got my attorney's fees paid.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Nov 18, 2017 9:37 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] CH. 13: Objecting to claim after payout
>
> I just substituted into a Ch. 13 case where 100% of the claims
> have already been paid and debtor needed help winding up the case.
>
> Debtor tells me she wants to object to one of the claims now.
>   (Debtor was In Pro Per before)
>
> Has anyone ever objected to a claim after the claim has been
> paid by the Trustee?  If successful can/will the Trustee  seek
> to recover the money paid out?
>
> -Mark
>
>
> ************************************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> _*Mailing Address Only:*_
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of
> California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the
> law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The
> information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If
> you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy,
> distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with
> requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S.
> tax advice contained in this communication (or in any
> attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
> be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
> Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
> recommending to another party any transaction or matter
> addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>
>
>
>
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
_*Mailing Address Only:*_
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of
the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

CH. 13: Objecting to claim after payout

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:37 am
by Yahoo Bot

body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}
Yes. But if not you can file a motion for turnover. I did it, won and got my attorney's fees paid.
-----OrigDCBAA@YAHOOGROUPS.COM>Sent: Nov 18, 2017 9:37 AM To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com Subject: [cdcbaa] CH. 13: Objecting to claim after payout
I just substituted into a Ch. 13 case where 100% of the claims have already been paid and debtor needed help winding up the case.Debtor tells me she wants to object to one of the claims now. (Debtor was In Pro Per before) Has anyone ever objected to a claim after the claim has been paid by the Trustee? If successful can/will the Trustee seek to recover the money paid out? -Mark
************************************************Mark J. MarkusLaw Office of Mark J. MarkusMailing Address Only:11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA 91604-2652(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)web: http://www.bklaw.com/Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of Legal SpecializationThis Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency________________________________________________NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

CH. 13: Objecting to claim after payout

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:37 am
by Yahoo Bot

I just substituted into a Ch. 13 case where 100% of the claims have
already been paid and debtor needed help winding up the case.
Debtor tells me she wants to object to one of the claims now.
(Debtor was In Pro Per before)
Has anyone ever objected to a claim after the claim has been paid by
the Trustee?  If successful can/will the Trustee  seek to recover
the money paid out?
-Mark
************************************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
_*Mailing Address Only:*_
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)332-1180 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of
the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.