Hello Pat: If you're trying to use the doctrine to shut the door on the
trustee's misguided attempts to do something, then it would seem that
"latches" would be the proper spelling.
Okay, that's a bad one.
John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates
*818/889-8080*
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Patrick T. Green wrote:
> **
>
>
> Please note that the proper spelling is laches.****
>
> ** **
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.****
>
> ** **
>
> Pat****
>
> ** **
>
> Patrick T. Green****
>
> Attorney at Law****
>
> Fitzgerald & Green****
>
> 1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206****
>
> Pasadena, CA 91106****
>
> Tel: 626-449-8433****
>
> Fax: 626-449-0565****
>
>
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:*
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 3:57 PM
> *To:*
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Thanks!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq..****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> 818-347-5800****
>
> ** **
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not represent you until a
> written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been
> paid.****
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 3:40 PM, "Catherine Christiansen"
christiansenlaw@yahoo.com> wrote:****
>
> ****
>
> Then file your opposition, it doesn't have to be much because you are
> filing a MoMod also. I am not sure if the 120 is necessary to pay all the
> claims so I would be careful about pointing the finger to harshly as the
> attorney is also supposed to be reviewing the claims to make sure the plan
> will pay out. Be sure and file the MoMod so the court will see the
> solution and you can get a yes answer. Don't forget to factor in your
> attorney fees so you can be paid for your work so your clients can enjoy
> the privilege of the protection of a chapter 13 bankruptcy. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
> 17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
> Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572
>
attorneychristiansen@gmail.com****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* "Leventhal Law Group, P.C."
> *To:* "
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 1:33 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Its Rojas, they will not talk they want an opposition filed!****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> Tel.: 818-347-5800****
>
> Fax: 818-936-0302****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written
> fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal
> Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.****
>
> ****
>
> *From:*
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2013 1:26 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Doctrine of Latches****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> You may want to try talking with the trustee staff attorney assigned to
> the case about spreading out the missed payments over the remainder of the
> plan. Dockery's staff attorneys are usually very helpful.
> Also consider a motion to modify (MOMOD).****
>
> On Apr 15, 2013 1:07 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:*
> ***
>
> ****
>
> I would like the groups opinion on a matter.****
>
> ****
>
> I am opposing a motion to dismiss my Clients case by the Chapter 13
> Trustee. Basically the Debtor as been paying the wrong amount for almost
> two years. He has been short about $120.00. However, the trustee is first
> filing a motion to dismiss.****
>
> ****
>
> The only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this
> defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.****
>
> Tel.: 818-347-5800****
>
> Fax: 818-936-0302****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice
> for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
> California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
> business hours.****
>
> ****
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential,
> and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto)
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.****
>
> ****
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.****
>
> ****
>
> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not reprenet you until a written
> fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal
> Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
>
>
Hello Pat: If you're trying to use the doctrine to shut the door on the trustee's misguided attempts to do something, then it would seem that "latches" would be the proper spelling.
Okay, that's a bad one. John D. Faucher
Faucher & Associates818/889-8080
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Patrick T. Green <
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com> wrote:
Please note that the proper spelling is laches.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
PatPatrick T. Green
Attorney at LawFitzgerald & Green
1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.comThe only ground I can come up with is latches! Has anyone ever used this defense with a trustee before? Thoughts?
ground:white">
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
Tel.: 818-347-5800
Fax: 818-936-0302
The post was migrated from Yahoo.