FOF and COL
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:18 pm
I have been told by a couple of clients who went for printouts at the social security office that they will no longer be providing proof of social printouts as of January 2014. Another client told me February 2014 as the final date. People will either have to apply for a new SS card & wait or maybe even bring original proof to the 341a. I might be asking too much.
Has anyone received a definitive date from the social security office?
David
This message is from an attorney and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential, including, without limitation, attorney-client privileged communication(s) and/or confidential attorney work product. Unless you are the addressee or authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you may not use, copy,or disclose this message or any information contained herein. If you havereceived this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete any version, response, or reference to it. Thank you.
From michael@avanesianlaw.com Fri Dec 20 13:18:52 2013
Return-Path:
X-Sender: csulamath@gmail.com
X-Apparently-To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 22344 invoked by uid 102); 20 Dec 2013 21:18:52 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.143)
by m15.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2013 21:18:52 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 17362 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2013 21:18:52 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mail-vb0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43)
by mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2013 21:18:52 -0000
X-Received: by mail-vb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p6so1774937vbe.30
for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.166.6 with SMTP id zc6mr5489097vdb.10.1387574331782; Fri,
20 Dec 2013 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.108.36 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:18:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
References:
Just based off of reading LBRs, not experience, I would say lodge the word
version since the court will edit it and attach to the notice of lodgment.
LBR 7052-1 says you need to file and lodge (i.e. both) but I think it will
look silly to file the proposed fof/col in addition to a notice of lodgment
which also contains it as an attachment.
Sincerely,
Michael Avanesian
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>
> Are proposed FOF and COL lodged or filed?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
Just based off of reading LBRs, not experience, I would say lodge the word version since the court will edit it and attach to the notice of lodgment. LBR 7052-1 says you need to file and lodge (i.e. both) but I think it will look silly to file the proposed fof/col in addition to a notice of lodgment which also contains it as an attachment.
Sincerely, Michael Avanesian
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
Are proposed FOF and COL lodged or filed?
Thanks,
The post was migrated from Yahoo.