multiple related motions in single filing
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:19 am
some think it is better form to file two motions. Many lawyers would combine the two.
d
Sent from mars
On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:30 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
> I would still do it seperately.
>
>
> Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
> 818.347.5800
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Sent: 06/02/2013 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
>
>
>
> To clarify what I have in mind:
> Motion for OSC for creditor's disregard of court's order confirming plan; motion for sanctions
> 2 motions combined in one document
>
> Make sense?
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
>>
>>
>> No
>>
>> Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
>> Leventhal Law Group, P. C.
>> 818.347.5800
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
>> Sent: 06/02/2013 5:56 PM
>> Subject: [cdcbaa] multiple related motions in single filing
>>
>>
>>
>> Can two or three related motions be combined in a single filing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.