As long as it was partially underwater.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2013, at 3:32 PM, "Patrick T. Green" wrote:
> I sunk one a while back. Does that count as a cramdown?
>
>
>
> If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> Patrick T. Green
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> Fitzgerald & Green
>
> 1010 E. Union St. Ste. 206
>
> Pasadena, CA 91106
>
> Tel: 626-449-8433
>
> Fax: 626-449-0565
>
>
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
>
>
>
Larry Webb
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 2:22 PM
> To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] vehicle cram down values in Chapter 13
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone crammed down a boat (water vehicle?) payment?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
>
>
> Larry Webb
>
> State Bar of California 229344
>
> Central District California
>
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
>
> Check out my Blog
>
>
>
>
>
> Larry@webbklaw. com
>
> Law Offices of Larry Webb
>
> 484 Mobil Ste 43
>
> Camarillo Ca 93010
>
>
>
> P 805.987.1400
>
> F 805.987.2866
>
> C 805.750.2150
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Mark J. Markus
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:10 AM
> To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] vehicle cramdown values in Chapter 13
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone successfully argued that something other than retail value by NADA is the appropriate value to use for cramming down a vehicle in Ch. 13 under RASH? In other words, has anyone successfully argued, for example, that the private party (rather than retail) value would be the appropriate replacement cost under 506?
>
> --
>
> ******************************************
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> web:
http://www.bklaw.com/
> Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist- The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at
http://www.bklaw.com/bankruptcy-blog/20 ... efinition/)
> ________________________________________________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.