Page 1 of 1
Wells Fargo is not allowing debtors who did not reaffirm their morta
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:12 pm
by Yahoo Bot
God help me. Please, "re" is one of the shortest prefixes in our language. No one should hyphenate re-? Reaffirm is a bankruptcy term. Please, please, please!
d
On Jun 18, 2013, at 4:59 PM, "Frank W. Molloy" wrote:
> I am confused here, Did Wells send her a reaffirmation agreement which she declined to sign? If so, and this was a purchase money mortgage, what is her downside in re-affirming. No personal liability anyway isn't that correct? And the one action rule also protects her if it is a first mortgage. Perhaps Debtors should consider re-affirming....
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Wells Fargo is not allowing debtors who did not reaffirm their morta
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:04 pm
by Yahoo Bot
If it is not a purchase money, then there is liability. Further, our
judges will not sign a reaffirmation agreement for real property.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Wells Fargo is not allowing debtors who did not reaffirm their morta
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:59 pm
by Yahoo Bot
I am confused here, Did Wells send her a reaffirmation agreement which she declined to sign? If so, and this was a purchase money mortgage, what is her downside in re-affirming. No personal liability anyway isn't that correct? And the one action rule also protects her if it is a first mortgage. Perhaps Debtors should consider re-affirming....
I am confused here, Did Wells send her a reaffirmation agreement which she declined to sign? If so, and this was a purchase money mortgage, what is her downside in re-affirming. No personal liability anyway isn't that correct? And the one action rule also protects her if it is a first mortgage. Perhaps Debtors should consider re-affirming....
The post was migrated from Yahoo.