Line 31 on Means Test and Fertility treatments?

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm



The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


My understanding of the Means Test goes on the prior 6 months of income and expenses only. Not future payments.
Sent from my iPhone: Nathan Berneman
On Jul 18, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Holly Roark wrote:
> If the Debtor expects to pay $15,000 for fertility treatments in the next year, including for an egg donor and IVF, is this an acceptable deduction on line 31 of the Means Test? Has anyone had this scenario? If so, did the UST object?
>
>
> Holly Roark
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
> holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
> *By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
>
>
>
> **For a quicker response, email me at holly@roarklawoffices.com.
> I only use gmail for my listservs, and am likely to miss private emails
> directed to my gmail account.**
>
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


If the Debtor expects to pay $15,000 for fertility treatments in the next
year, including for an egg donor and IVF, is this an acceptable deduction
on line 31 of the Means Test? Has anyone had this scenario? If so, did the
UST object?
Holly Roark
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
**For a quicker response, email me at holly@roarklawoffices.com.
I only use gmail for my listservs, and am likely to miss private emails
directed to my gmail account.**
If the Debtor expects to pay $15,000 for fertility treatments in the next year,includingfor an egg donor and IVF,is this an acceptable deduction on line 31 of the Means Test? Has anyone had this scenario? If so, did the UST object?
Holly RoarkCertified Bankruptcy Specialist*
holly@roarklawoffices.com**primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal
Specialization
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply