Page 1 of 1

Acknowledgement of Satisfaction of Adversary Judgment

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:01 pm
by Yahoo Bot

I'd use the CA form and change the caption to reflect the A/P case information. File the executed Satisfaction in the A/P and then get a certified copy from the BK court to record.
Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
Torrance, California 90503
(310) 792-5864; 792-5866 (fax)
MitnickLaw@aol.com
Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
The information contained in this email message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the email message you received and all of the attached files.
To: cdcbaa
Sent: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 3:50 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Acknowledgement of Satisfaction of Adversary Judgment
I am in the process of settling an old adversary judgment on behalf of a client. Under CA law they have a Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment Judicial Counsel form: EJ100. I do not see anything in our local bk forms, district court forms or frankly any reference as to how to address the satisfaction of judgment in the FRBP, local rules or FRCP. Any of you seen one in a bankruptcy adversary case?
Mark Jessee
I'd use the CA form and change the caption to reflect the A/P case information. File the executed Satisfaction in the A/P and then get a certified copy from the BK court to record.
Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ste. 1080
Torrance, California 90503
(310) 792-5864; 792-5866 (fax)
MitnickLaw@aol.com

Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

The information contained in this email message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the email message you received and all of the attached files.
.AOLWebSuite .AOLPicturesFullSizeLink { height: 1px; width: 1px; overflow: hidden; } .AOLWebSuite a {color:blue; text-decoration: underline; cursor: pointer} .AOLWebSuite a.hsSig {cursor: default}
To: cdcbaa <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 3:50 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Acknowledgement of Satisfaction of Adversary Judgment

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Acknowledgement of Satisfaction of Adversary Judgment

Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:49 pm
by Yahoo Bot

I am in the process of settling an old adversary judgment on behalf of a client. Under CA law they have a Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment Judicial Counsel form: EJ100. I do not see anything in our local bk forms, district court forms or frankly any reference as to how to address the satisfaction of judgment in the FRBP, local rules or FRCP. Any of you seen one in a bankruptcy adversary case?
Mark Jessee

The post was migrated from Yahoo.