Clarification Needed on Basic Concept Re. Property of Estate
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:18 pm
Does the book actually say Post Petition Rents/Proceeds? Post is a prefix, not a proper noun, was it a heading?
You are correct. The main argument is what percentage of the effort has to be performed postpetition? Even an open escrow can be contested from a trustee, but only if efforts are required to facilitate the closing. The question is the percentage of prepetition work versus postpetition work. Negotiate a reasonable split.
d
Sent from Mars
D
On Jul 27, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Michael Avanesian wrote:
> This section of the book is written in an extremely convoluted way. I used amazon to look at the page referenced.
>
> Section 11 on page 12 is talking about Post Petition Rents/Proceeds. I think a good example to articulate their idea (assuming no other rules applied) is:
>
> Supposed I am paid $3,000 in cash, to stand on the street and hold a sign for 3 days. At 12:00 a.m. on the second day, I file for bankruptcy. This is covered by 541(a)(6), "(6) Proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits of or from property of the estate, EXCEPT such as are earnings from services performed by an individual debtor after the commencement of the case."
>
> So I would say $1,000 is prepetition and part of the estate while $2,000 is postpetition and not part of the estate.
>
> I believe when the authors say that "proceeds from personal services by an individual debtor are not property of the estate even if earned before the petition" they mean that money given to an individual debtor, before they file for bankruptcy, for personal services that end up being performed after bankruptcy are not property of the estate.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael Avanesian
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem
> www.tilemlaw.com
> 818-507-6000
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
>>
>> It holds the door open nicely
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq..
>> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
>> 818-347-5800
>>
>> NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept e-mail notice for ex parte Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular business hours.
>>
>> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
>>
>> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
>>
>> Note: The Leventhal Law Group, P.C. does not represent you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and a representative of the Leventhal Law Group, P.C. and all fees listed in the agreement have been paid.
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2013, at 2:33 PM, "pat@fitzgreenlaw.com" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> But u told us to buy it.
>>>
>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>> Sender: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:24:24 -0700
>>> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>>> ReplyTo: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Clarification Needed on Basic Concept Re. Property of Estate
>>>
>>>
>>> find a shredder and throw the book into it. There are lots of times income earned prepetition are included in the estate. e.g.
>>> real estate commissions when case filed before the closing.
>>> royalties, etc, etc. etc
>>> d
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Imagine the basic scenario in almost every ch7 consumer case: John files ch7 personal BK on Jan 1. The next day after the commencement of the case, on Jan 2, John's employer pays him for work performed before the ch7 case filing. Is that money from the paycheck property of the estate?
>>>>
>>>> My understanding has always been that 541(a)(6) states that the estate includes proceeds of or from property of the estate. Thus the postpetition payment for prepetition services meets the "proceeds" definition because John earned the right to payment prior to filing. The right to payment was property of the estate and thus the actual payment is property is the estate, subject to any applicable exemptions.
>>>>
>>>> Now the EZ Rules for the BK Code Book says on Pg12 of the book: "proceeds from personal services by an individual debtor are not property of the estate, even if earned before the petition." Perhaps I am misreading EZ Rules, but it seems to state the opposite position that John's paycheck in the above scenario would NOT be property of the estate and I can't imagine that is correct.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
cdcbaamailbox@gmail.com>
Sender:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.